A recent look at some of the news stories around health care do not paint a pretty picture for Family Medicine. In Ottawa, a truly wonderful 41 year old Family Physician (whom I had the pleasure of meeting when I was OMA President) is closing her family practice due to burn out. The BC government is on the defensive over the shortage of Family Physicians. Medical School graduates are avoiding Family Medicine. The list goes depressingly on, but the point is clear.
Family Medicine is in crisis.
Jumping into this environment is former Ontario Deputy Health Minister Bob Bell and his colleagues. To fix Family Practice, they recommend expanded use of Nurse Practitioners (NPs), allowing them to work independently to replace much of what family doctors do. They claim that NPs can independently provide care for rosters of 800 patients, and collaborate with Family Doctors only for more complex patients. The authors reference a British Medical Journal (BMJ) study that suggests this will be “cost-saving.”
Bell doubles down on his beliefs that NPs can replace family doctors on Twitter by cherry picking data, in this case a Cochrane review:
One wonders if Bell and his colleagues bothered to read the reviews. If they had, they would have seen that the BMJ study on “cost-effectiveness” admitted:
“…it was not possible to draw conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of the complementary provider specialized ambulatory care role of nurse practitioners because of the generally low quality of evidence.“
And that the “authoritative” (Bell’s words not mine) Cochrane review also stated:
“We are uncertain of the effects of nurse‐led care on the costs of care because the certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low.“
For those of you not versed in medical literature those phrases are the author’s way of saying they did studies where the results couldn’t be relied upon to be reproducible. Using these to promote a belief that allowing NPs to work independently to replace family docs is…….puzzling.
Bell’s belief that Family Docs are easily replaceable is nothing new. He planned on actually ending his career as a general practitioner. Apparently he thought he could easily slide back into it after having done it for a couple of years early in his career, then gone on be an orthopaedic surgeon for another few decades before getting involved in health administration and the MOH:
I don’t personally attribute any malice to his statement (though others on that thread did), I’m not sure that that Bell realized just how much he insulted every single GP in Canada with his seeming belief that he could simply suddenly switch gears after 4 decades of not being in primary care, and go back to being a GP without at least a residency. Hate to tell you this Dr. Bell, but Family Medicine has changed a LOT since you last practiced it. We have more than just beef or pork insulin for diabetes for example.
More to the point however, is there data out there that actually looks at the kind of system that Bell and his colleagues would propose? One where NPs scope of practice is drastically increased allowing them to work independently, and they replace the bulk of work that Family Doctors do? Turns out, there is.
In South Mississippi, the Hattiesburg Medical Clinic, an Accountable Care Organization that is very similar in structure to the proposed Ontario Health Teams (OHTs), did exactly what is Bell and his colleagues are proposing. Fifteen years ago, based on ongoing shortages in Family Physicians, NPs and Physician Assistants (collectively referred to as Advanced Practice Providers or APPs) were hired and allowed to work separately and independently with physician colleagues.
Did this work? In a word: Nope.
A comprehensive analysis of their findings (minimum of 11 years of data over a large patient population) was published in the Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association. You can read the details for yourself but here are some highlights:
- the cost for looking after patients who did not have end stage renal disease (i.e. were on dialysis) or were not in nursing homes was $43 a month higher per patient for those who were looked after by APPs than family docs
- when the data was adjusted for complex patients, the cost of having an APP look after them, rather than a family doc was $119 per month higher (!)
- these costs were attributed to ordering more tests/more referrals to specialists and MORE emergency department use (yes MORE)
- Physicians performed better on 9 out of 10 quality metrics in the review
In short, doing what Bell and his colleagues are suggesting led to poorer overall health care outcomes at an increased cost.
Now to be completely clear, I personally have worked with NPs in a number of ways. I strongly believe they are an essential part of the health care team and provide a valuable service. In my practice, they have assisted me in providing care to my patients. When I had a couple of “cardiac kids” in my practice, I dealt exclusively with the NPs on the cardiology team at the Hospital for Sick Children (never once spoke to a Cardiologist or Cardiovascular Surgeon). When the Royal Victoria Hospital in Barrie had NPs on their oncology service, I discussed issues around cases with them exclusively. The NPs were at all times incredibly helpful to me and my patients. NPs definitely have a role to play.
I would also point out that the Hattiesburg Medical Clinic feels the same way. They strongly valued their NPs, and still have them on staff. But they have modified the way they provide care to ensure that all patients now have a Family Doctor but the visits to the clinic now alternate between the Doctor and the APP. On days when only an APP is in house, telemedicine back up by physicians is provided.
We need to build a better Family Practice system. In order to do so, NPs can and should play an essential role. That role however, is not taking on independent rosters of patients. It is working as valued members of a team that looks after a patient population, where each patient has a Family Doctor.
4 thoughts on “What Role Should Nurse Practitioners Play in Health Care?”
Great article. I am a family doctor who has worked with a nurse practioner for 4 years. She totally takes over when I am not there and has no supervision. She can see 6 patient per hour. A lot of NP’s can only see 2 per hour.
As an NP working in Ontario in an NP led clinic I would like to point out that we are not supervised by physicians. The NP led clinic model has been a value add for unattached patients for over a decade and adds a tremendous contribution to accessing much needed services for at risk patients. All health providers are needed and essential; we need more physicians, specialists, NPs, PTs, the list goes on and on. However, there continues to be a knowledge gap around scope of practice, and understanding of roles that need to be addressed for everyone to be on the same page. NPs are different then physicians in many ways, both are important. Adding choice and diversity in health care should be celebrated in a changing social climate. I think we all, collectively i.e the frontline workers – know that there is not enough man power anywhere, and what we need are more skilled health professionals working together, collaboratively. Less ruffled feathers and more cohesive action.
Agree with both statements above – that ship has sailed. Completely. NPs run their own independent practices, and are MRPs in many environments, including primary care. We already practice independently. End of that conversation.
We consult our colleagues when we need help – that could be a primary care physician, but it’s more often a physiotherapist, a social worker, or a specialist (NP or MD).
The truth is there is no model of primary care that’s cost-effective. Including multidisciplinary teams. Case management is a major cost and neither MDs nor NPs should be doing that – that’s definitely not cost effective.
NPs are not trying to replace GPs. We’re offering a different model of care, and the patients that seek out NPs in primary care know that – and it’s their choice. NPs just want equitable payment structures – and the ability to self start their own practice and make an income.
I have worked as an NP in Northern Ontario for over 20 years, with 18 years working as an Rn before that. I find your comments offensive and ignorant. You are obviously not aware that an NP works independently, and consults with colleagues when required, as any professional would do.
You will never find a true cost saving for a Nurse Practitioner because in spite of the fact that we work independently, the Ministry of Health systems for Primary Care Teams continues to rely on rostering patients. Patients can only be rostered to physicians, so the care we provide is hidden in the ongoing political wheel that is healthcare.
In the North, we work in a very expanded scope of practice providing care for marginalized and elderly populations. We most often work alone, but of course consult with the most appropriate colleague when needed. As we are a “team”, all allied health have a role to play in primary care. The consult may or may not be with a physician. The physicians we work WITH are most thankful that they have colleagues to assist with provision of Primary Care just for the reason you have mentioned. THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS IN CRISIS! We need all the players we can get if we are to move through this next period of time with any sense of competency.
The final addition to our scope of practice is authorization for ordering Ct and MRI which will occur July 1, 2022– after much political shoe dragging and unnecessary delay. Many of us have been independently providing primary care to rosters of more than 800 patients for many years.
You cannot compare a Physician Assistant to a Nurse Practitioner. A Nurse Practitioner is licensed by our professional body, the College Of Nurses of Ontario. As such, we are regulated providers who are legally responsible for the care we provide. A PA works FOR a physician, and the physician is responsible for the care they provide. HUGE DIFFERENCE!
Shame on you for continuing to perpetuate the myth that primary care can only be provided by physicians. We all have areas of expertise, and we should be holding those up to share with each other so we can all benefit from each other’s rich and diverse knowledge, experience and skill. I dare say you must work in solo practice because the benefit of a team approach is glaringly absent in your commentary. I think that you would benefit from working as a locum in a NORTHERN health care team. Perhaps this would help you to understand our role, our contributions to our community and our patients. I dare say you might change your tune. Respectfully submitted.