Tag: #familymedicine

Never Ending Arbitration a Sign Government Does NOT Want to Work with Doctors

News Item #1: Prince Edward Island agrees to a contract with its doctors. Amongst other things, the deal recognizes that family medicine is a specialty (finally!) and increases compensation to reflect that. It also introduces strong measures to reduce red tape and administrative burdens, and adds what appear to be retention bonuses. PEI joins British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and even Alberta (!) in working co-operatively with their doctors.

Dr. Krista Cassell of Medical Society of PEI with Health and Wellness Minister Mark McLane and Health PEI CEO Melanie Fraser

News Item #2: Ontario Medical Association (OMA) Board chair Cathy Faulds announced last week that the Kaplan Board of Arbitration will not deliver a ruling on the fractious contract dispute between Ontario’s doctors and the Ministry of Health (MOH)at the end of August as expected. It is delayed until at least the end of September, if not longer.

OMA Board Chair Dr. Cathy Faulds
Arbitration Board Chair William Kaplan

Now you, dear reader, are probably wondering why I refer to a one month delay as “never-ending”. Firstly, because I’m not convinced it’s only one month. I don’t recall the Arbitrator ever giving us a timeline for when he was going to give a decision when I was on the OMA Board. Timelines for meetings and hearings, sure – but for the decision, no.

But more importantly, even if there is a ruling in September, it’s nothing but a mere step in a protracted, convoluted process that, at the end of the day, does nothing more than show that the government would rather not engage the OMA in providing solutions for our health care crisis. To understand why, one needs to first appreciate the prolonged nature of the current arbitration process, and just how tortuous it is. (I will do my best).

First, the current arbitration process is ONLY for one PART of the first year of what is supposed to be a four year contract. It will cover April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025. BUT, it will only cover a percentage increase for that one year. It will not set specific fees for different specialties. Instead, there was general agreement (last I heard) that 70% of the increase would go towards fee increases and the other 30% would go towards targeted areas of high need.

Sounds simple enough to sort out right? If the deal is worth, say $2 billion (this number is totally made up and Mr. Kaplan, if you are reading, this number is much less than the increase should be), then $1.4 billion would go towards fee increases, and $600 million would be targeted towards areas of need.

The problem is that the fee increases are to be distributed along what’s know as a “relativity model”. Essentially lower paid specialists are to be given a bigger raise than higher paid ones. Unfortunately, the OMA and MOH can’t agree on how those raises are to be distributed amongst the various specialties. Worse, they can’t agree on how to distribute the 30% that was earmarked for “targeted funds”.

Which means…..you guessed it, ANOTHER round of arbitration with yet another set of decisions to be ruled upon by the arbitrator. This additional protracted process won’t begin until the arbitrators first ruling and further negotiations and mediations. The information on the OMA website suggests arbitration for those issues won’t happen until March 3, 2025.

But wait, didn’t I say that this was only for the first year of the four year contract? Why yes, yes I did. Which means that after this, we now start arbitration AGAIN for years 2-4 for the doctors contract. And yet again, not only do decisions needed to be made on the percentage increase, but on how that increase is divided up. Which means…….potentially many more rounds of arbitration.

I would concede the OMA websites suggests all of the year 2-4 arbitration, and left over issues from year one can be done at the same time (March 3-7, 2025). However, I will refrain from betting the mortgage on that actually coming to fruition. We are one early election from this timeline being thrown into chaos. The cynic in me thinks that by the time arbitration is all done for this supposed four year cycle, it will be time to start negotiating (and yes more arbitration!) for the next four year cycle.

The government will most likely abide by the initial arbitration award (it’s doubtful they would reject an award prior to an election call). Ontario Health Minister Galen Weston Sylvia Jones will frame this as part of the process for coming to an agreement. She will (probably) claim that by abiding by the award the government is “working with” physicians to benefit the health care needs of the province.

She will be wrong.

I’ve mentioned this before, arbitration is preferable to the days when governments could unilaterally cut physicians income at the whim of the health minister. However, that doesn’t change the fact that arbitration should be viewed as a necessary evil, with emphasis on the evil. Not only can it demoralize people who are going through it, the spill over effects have wide reaching consequences.

What does this mean for the general public? The OMA has come up with some solutions for the various crises our health care system is facing (2.5 million without a family doctors, worsening health care catastrophe in Northern Ontario, overwhelming bureaucratic burden etc). The reality is that many of the solutions require changes that need to be made in a contract with Ontario’s doctors. But we don’t have one, so none of these will be implemented.

Instead of working co-operatively with the OMA to come up with solutions in a fair contract, the current government seemingly prefers to leave it all to the arbitrator. And as a result, patients will continue to suffer.

The government of Ontario has a choice. Follow the lead of BC, Manitoba, PEI and so on and work with the doctors to help patients. Or set up a perpetual conflict with them.

Over to you Minister.

Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones, who can start to fix things tomorrow, if she wants.

Reflections on Leaving Family Practice

My thanks to Dr. Ramsey Hijazi, founder of the OUFP, and one of the strongest advocates for improving family medicine that I know, for guest blogging for me today. Unfortunately, the government didn’t listen to Dr. Hijazi, and as a result he left family practice earlier this year. In this blog he reflects on how his life has changed since.

It was a busy Saturday morning at my daughter’s dance competition in April 2024. The family had all got up at 5am to get ready for the day. The morning was hectic getting the kids and dog dressed and fed, making sure we didn’t forget supplies for the day, packing snacks and then rushing across the city to Hull for the competition.

My wife helped bring my daughter and her sister backstage to get dressed and prepare for practice. I watched my 2 year old son run tirelessly down the hall of the venue screaming in pleasure. I watched with a sense of calm and patience that I hadn’t felt in a very long time. More than I can remember I felt….present. The previous day I had left my family practice to pursue a position as a hospitalist. In less than 24 hours (and to my own disbelief) I noticed a distinct difference in my frame of mind.

Leaving family practice was not an easy decision. It is a rewarding and challenging career where you can make a positive difference in the lives of your patients. You get to know your patients better than anyone else in the medical system as you care for them from birth to old age. Their journeys in the medical system can remain with you forever. I became a family doctor because I loved family medicine and I am grateful for having had the opportunity to practice and take care of my patients. It is also part of the reason I started the Ontario Union of Family Physicians in July 2023 to help advocate for changes to improve the working conditions of family doctors. I had hoped to continue this work.

However, over the last several years the landscape of family practice has deteriorated significantly. The administrative or paperwork burden in family medicine has ballooned to almost 20 hrs/week. It is a constant barrage of work that is being downloaded or dumped on to family doctors from specialists, insurance companies and pharmacies. There’s also the extraordinary duplication of lengthy and sometimes irrelevant hospital reports that come in daily for review.

In essence, you supervise every single step all of your patients take in the medical system whether you have seen them recently or not. You ensure that tests and follow ups are completed and that nothing falls through the cracks. If my patients did not have me overseeing their journey in the system, countless tests and follow ups would get missed and never take place.

Like it or not, family physicians have been unofficially assigned the responsibility to make sure things actually get done when no one else will. It is mentally exhausting. There were days I would come home from work feeling so overstimulated I could do nothing more than sit on the couch and keep silently to myself for the rest of the night (although young kids make that a difficult reality to realize).

In an age where patients can simply email their family doctor you are never unplugged from your job. Despite trying to convince myself that I wouldn’t think or worry about work on vacation, I couldn’t help but have intrusive thoughts that occupied my mind. I would drift away from the present moment I was trying to enjoy. Often I would use the first and last days of my vacation as a desperate attempt to try and be caught up.

On weekends when not much was happening, such as watching TV with the kids or supervising them in the backyard I also couldn’t help but have the same intrusive thoughts of thinking my time could be better spent trying to catch up on the paperwork that was piling in. I very much resented having these thoughts.

Now add this to the stress of running a family practice. Business expenses have steadily increased with a dramatic spike in the last 3-4 years without any real increase in OHIP revenue. Running a business can be a stressful, but worthwhile endeavour. Unfortunately, this couldn’t be further from the reality of running a family practice. Revenue from OHIP continues to pay less year over year relative to inflation and expenses.

The OMA has kept track of OHIP rates relative to inflation to show current rates are only 37% of what OHIP used to pay physicians to run their practice. For the newer family doctors entering practice the future stability of the profession is truly grim. They enter practice with huge loads of debt and an almost guarantee they will take home less and less money every year despite the workload contrarily increasing year over year. With no pension, benefits, paid sick time or vacation to top it off, the reality for recent grads is that without significant changes to help the profession, it is no longer a viable career option.

Many family doctors work side jobs to help financially subsidize their practice. Granted, the entire medical system is plagued with poor working conditions, underfunding and increasing burdens of work, however, the situation is particularly magnified in family medicine. But you don’t need to take my word for it, just look around to see what is going on in your community and in our province. Despite the OMA showing statistics that we have more doctors trained in family medicine per capita than ever before, we are in one of the worst shortages ever.

Family doctors simply don’t want to do family medicine any more.

Changing my career path to work in the hospital as a hospitalist was a big risk and required a leap of faith (I hadn’t worked in a hospital since I finished residency). But unfortunately, in family medicine I had become increasingly unhappy professionally and personally. As it turns out, becoming a hospitalist was the best decision I could have ever made. Working in hospital means I am responsible only for the patients on my ward and not 1500 patients in the medical system. I must round on and see each patient to review their medical problems, perform examinations and order any tests or investigations. I follow up with family when needed and appropriate for medical updates. At the end of the day unless I am on call, I walk through the door to go home and my work is done until I arrive again the next morning. There is no appointment schedule to rigidly follow and I can take as much or as little time that is needed for each patient. If something unexpected occurs, I can deal with it and get back to my work without the worry or stress of being behind schedule and having irritated patients. It is also challenging and extremely rewarding.

No longer do I have all the stresses of running a business or see up to 40% of my OHIP billings go towards business expenses. No longer do I need to reconcile rushing several patients in and out of the clinic for appointments to stay on schedule and maintain a reasonable availability while also trying to give the appropriate time to address their concerns. No longer do I leave work at the end of the day, eat dinner with the family and go back to the computer to tackle the never ending pile of paperwork. No longer do I need to worry and stress while on vacation about all the work that is piling up in my absence. No longer do I have the intrusive thoughts of working on paperwork while watching the kids ride their bikes or to watch my son run down that venue hall aimlessly in pleasure.

I am more present and at peace. I am a better person, husband and parent because of my decision to leave family practice and that is perhaps the saddest and scariest thing about this entire journey.

Dear Minister Jones – Fire Your Negotiations Team.

Dear Minister Jones,

Just me again, a certain crotchety and increasingly cantankerous geezer offering you advice in an open letter that you are not likely to take. But you would be better off if you did. More importantly, so would the people of Ontario.

Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones

First, I would once again suggest that you have done some good work in the health ministry. Moving surgical procedures to outpatient clinics, increasing the number of diagnostic testing facilities, starting a new medical school focused on training family doctors and more are all good moves. While the effects of some of those decisions will not be felt for many years – the reality is that somebody had to do this to help health care down the road and you’ve done that.

Unfortunately however, the past couple of weeks have been catastrophic for your Ministry’s relationship with Ontario’s doctors. It’s funny how one dumb decision or comment can completely wreck a relationship, but that’s exactly what happened when your Negotiations Team stated that there was “no concern” about a diminished supply of doctors. Therefore, they refused to negotiate money for retention of physicians or admin work, like other provinces have (cough BC, cough Manitoba, cough EVEN Alberta!)

In essence, your Negotiations Team has been a disaster, first by militantly dragging out negotiations into a very adversarial arbitration process (when all the other provinces above figured out a way to, you know, respectfully negotiate with doctors) – and then by making a statement about the supply of doctors that is so comically stupid and out of touch that Ontario has become a laughing stock.

David Price
Bob Bass
Craig Rix

Three members of the Ministry’s Negotiations Team pictured above.

This will not bode well for health care in this province.

Look, I know there may be a temptation to say “Ok this was a mistake” and to try and walk back the comments.. While it’s abundantly true that the people of Ontario are a good and kind people who will forgive politicians if they own up to their mistakes (cough greenbelt, cough enhanced police powers and closing playgrounds during covid) – one thing that politicians can’t survive, is being made a laughing stock. Except Donald Trump of course. I still haven’t figured that one out and I don’t think I ever will. (N.B. Donald Trump is not someone you should try to emulate).

Anyway, the reality is that at this point you really only have one path left to turn this thing around. You have to fire your negotiations team. All of them. I’m not just talking about the seven who were appointed to lead that team, I’m talking about the multiple bureaucrats who give them supporting data and have influenced their position.

The only rational explanation I can think of for those bureaucrats promoting a position of “no concern” about physician supply, and saying doctors are not working hard enough, is that they hate doctors. Many of them were likely hired at a time when it was fashionable to bash doctors for billing “too much”. (BTW how did that attitude work out for the people of Ontario?) They’ve clearly carried on with that belief in the arbitration proposals.

I get that in arbitration, there will be some posturing. If your Negotiations Team had said “we’ll pay you $50 a month as a retention bonus” or “admin work doesn’t involve seeing patients, so we’ll pay you $20 an hour” – I honestly would have shrugged my shoulders, recognized it was part of the arbitration “game” and said nothing.

But to say retention and recruitment of physicians is not a major concern, when people line up for hours on end just for the faint chance of getting a family doctor?? That thought process can only be due to a pathologic hatred of physicians, or a delusional mindset totally divorced from reality. Either is a cause for termination. Can the whole team now.

A long line forms outside CDK Family Medicine and Walk-In Clinic in Kingston, Ont.. It was the first day of ‘rostering’ at the clinic, where four doctors will take as many as 4,000 new patients. (Jamie Corbett) – from CBC News

But what of negotiations with the OMA you may ask?

Actually, that’s not hard either. Your ministry has an appointee to the Arbitration Board, just like the OMA does. I believe your appointee is one Kevin Smith. The job of the appointee is to tell you and your team what the lead arbitrator, William Kaplan is thinking and how he is leaning. How they do that is beyond me. When I met Kaplan it was like talking to a Vulcan. There was absolutely no emotion or hint of what he was thinking – but apparently Kevin Smith is better than I am at figuring this out.

One of the above is William Kaplan, Arbitrator, and even after meeting him I’m not sure which is which.

What your appointee will tell you, and what the OMA appointee to the Board will tell the OMA is – Kaplan is wondering “this” or thinking “that” or leaning towards “X percent”. Find out what that X per cent is, offer it to the Doctors for the first year of the new Physicians Services Agreement (PSA). That solves things for one year, which gives you time to pick a brand new negotiations team for year 2-4 for the PSA.

Note to my three loyal readers, yes, this arbitration is ONLY for the percentage increase of the first year of the four year agreement. Worse, while the OMA and Ministry have generally agreed to a 70/30 split of whatever the amount is with 70% allotted to raises, and 30% to be given to targeted programs, they haven’t been able to agree on how the 30% is to be targeted. This means…..more arbitration for that piece. Then, it begins again next year for years 2-4 of the PSA. In essence, we appear to be locked in a perpetual, never ending antagonistic arbitration process (which is still better than unilateral government actions but really frustrating nonetheless).

As I told Premier Ford recently- if health care doesn’t get fixed – I don’t care what the polls say now, or how many by-elections you seem to have won, this is going to be a real problem in 2026. With health care in the crisis it is in now, you need all hands working together and co-operatively. Locking Ontario’s doctors into two more years of extremely adversarial arbitration shows that we are not co-operating and not working together. This is why graduates are leaving the province. And we can’t afford that.

It’s time for you to do the right thing for Ontario, and cut bait with your current negotiations team.

Yours sincerely,

An Old Country Doctor.

Perspectives on Ontario Health Care by a Recent Graduate

NB: My thanks to Dr. Tristan Brownrigg for guest blogging for me today. By his own admission, he never planned to be political, or seek out the limelight. But the situation in Ontario is such that he felt his perspective should be heard. I have a great deal of respect for people like Dr. Brownrigg, who are willing to step out of their comfort zone when necessary, and I commend him for doing so.

Dr. Tristan Brownrigg: I am a family physician, outdoorsman, and rural generalist currently working a mix of clinic, ER and inpatient care in the East Kootenays of British Columbia. I graduated from the University of Toronto Medical School, and did my Residency at Queen’s University (Kawartha site).

I completed family medicine residency in Ontario in 2022 and worked there for 6 months. Prior to this I completed medical school in Ontario, completed my undergraduate in Ontario, and had called Ontario home. Over the years I had watched my goal of working as a comprehensive rural family physician slowly become unsustainable amidst a collapsing system, decades of funding stagnation and poor planning, with a patchwork of good people on the ground trying to do their best in a system that doesn’t seem to value their input. Day after day the insidious march of the family medicine crisis grew closer to the forefront of peoples’ lives and garnered wider media attention, while the government either denied its existence or made no substantive changes that would realistically address it. This has not been the time for band-aids, let alone denial. 

Last year I moved to rural British Columbia to try something different for a year, cautiously optimistic about the significant changes to family practice on the back of the LFP model implementation in early 2023. The Longitudinal Family Physician (LFP) model significantly changed how family physicians billed and were compensated in BC, including the ability to bill for the many hours family physicians typically spend on previously unpaid administrative tasks.

My experience has been night and day. For the first time in my medical career I have felt hopeful about the future of family medicine and find my day to day life to be sustainable. These changes have been received positively amongst all other family physicians I have discussed it with. It is not perfect and there are still kinks to be ironed out, but I at least believe my provincial medical association and government are trying to improve things for family physicians. I am not left questioning if government actions are purely incompetent or malicious with the intent to drive privatization.  

I had retained my Ontario medical license until now, awaiting the May 2024 renewal deadline unsure if I would return home after a year of trying on a different life out west. Reading the recent government positions and negotiation briefs has been the final nail in the coffin for me. The disdain the Ontario government shows towards the hardworking family physicians who hold up the medical system is nothing short of repugnant. After more than a decade of training and education here, I will now be relinquishing my license to practice medicine in Ontario and stay in British Columbia.  

The minister of health thinks recruitment and retention is “not a major concern.” That’s the problem; it should be. If I am not a prime example of this, I don’t know what is. 

I wish all of my colleagues still in Ontario who do not have the luxury to vote with their feet the best of luck. If not this government, then I hope the next one learns to value your work and dedication.  

“Health Care for All” Policies Will HURT Physicians and Patients

Recently, physicians leaders have been in the media promoting the right to primary care. I generally refer to this as a “Health care for All” policy, as it is reflective of one of the tenets of former Health Minister (and current Dean of Queens Medical School) Dr Jane Philpott’s new book. Dr. Tara Kiran has also promoted the same through her “Our Care” project. These proposals seek to guarantee a family physician for everyone in a certain geographic area, just like children in an area are guaranteed a school.

Dr. Jane Philpott
Dr. Tara Kiran

While these policies sound nice (for reasons I’ll go over later) – they are doomed to failure. To understand why, let’s look at just two other situations – The Barer Stoddart Report and the move toward safe injection sites and decriminalization of illicit drugs. I appreciate my three loyal readers (I actually gained one!) might be wondering what this has to do with primary care. Bear with me, it hopefully will make sense later.

The Barer-Stoddart report is infamous in Ontario medical politics. It’s the report that is widely viewed as suggesting Ontario had too many (!) doctors in 1990s and led to the reduction of the number of medical school positions. However, what is not commonly appreciated is that was the last recommendation in the report. The first recommendations were to support the current supply of physicians by adding a large number of allied health professionals and making many health systems modifications. If and only if all those recommendations were carried out, then medical school enrolments could be cut. The bureaucrats and politicians looked at that, went through the report, decided that all the other recommendations were too expensive or complicated, and just cut med school enrolment. “The report told us to.”

Similarly, when it comes to drug decriminalization, the idea is best implemented in Portugal. The top line read is “addiction rates fall 40%” after Portugal introduced this policy. BUT a deep dive shows that before decriminalizing drugs, Portugal made a number of legislative changes, ensured that the court systems were educated, ensured that addiction therapy and counselling was available for addicts, and then implemented the decriminalization policy.

In Canada, our bureaucrats looked at Portugal, and figured all the rest of the changes were too complicated. But hey, maybe just decriminalizing will be enough without the other stuff! The result is a disaster when it comes to safe injection sites and an obviously failed policy.

So let’s look at the right to primary care that Drs. Philpott/Kiran and others propose. At their heart, ideas like this are reasonable, make sense and will help improve health care for the general population (I bet you didn’t think I’d say that did you?). They speak to a fairness that just isn’t apparent in the current system. One of the reasons that people pay taxes is so that those taxes can fund health care. How is it fair then, that one taxpayer has a family doctor, and another does not? How is it fair that one quarter of Ontarians can access team based health care, but the rest cannot? And so on.

Well then, what’s the problem and why do I think “Health Care for All” type policies will hurt physicians and patients?

Because I simply don’t believe that our politicians/health care bureaucrats will be able to implement all the work necessary to support this, prior to implementing this change.

Look at the other items I mentioned. Do you really think that the bureaucrats who mucked up so badly will get it right this time? Do you really believe that those bureaucrats are going to provide the admin support, the additional allied health workers, the organizational and structural backing first, before just writing out “everyone gets a family doctor” in the funding contracts?

Not a chance. Zilch. Zero. They will look at the need to invest in teams and say “too expensive.” They will look at the need to add administrative support first and decide that’s not feasible. They will look at the need to build healthcare infrastructure and be confused as to how to do it properly.  They will be aghast when they come to the part that says for teams to be successful, they must be physician led.  “But I’m the aide to the executive secretary of the assistant to the assistant deputy minister’s attache for the chief regional officer of the Primary Care Branch of the Ministry!  I should run the team!”

Then they will come to the part of the policy that says ensure every patient in a geographic area has a family doctor. And those bureaucrats will say “oh that’s easy to do with just some changes and regulation”. And they’ll do just that without any of structural changes needed.

I did some rough calculations for my neck of the woods. Each family doctor in my area would have to take on 200 unattached patients to make this work. The problem is we’re all working at 110% capacity right now. There’s no way we can do that.

So, once “health care for all” comes in what’s going to happen? Physicians will stop doing comprehensive family medicine, myself included.  You can only ask a person to work so hard before they get frustrated and quit.  Which increases the burden on the remaining physicians, which will cause more of them to quit.  And so on.

What’s worse, presenting these policies now deflects from the main issue. Basically, family medicine is no longer economically feasible. Without some immediate stabilization funding, family medicine will collapse.  By the time people figure out how to implement “Health Care for All” and reduce admin burden, you won’t have any family physicians left.  By introducing the “right to primary care” now, the laser like focus on just what is needed to make family practice economically viable is lost and this hurts everyone, patients included.

I genuinely have a great deal of respect for Dr. Kiran and Dr. Philpott in particular (she was the one who sacrificed her political career to warn us that our Prime Minister was an effete, vacuous ninny who for the sake of all Canadians needs to go back and teach drama classes).  But as well intentioned and well thought out as “Health Care for All” may be, now is not the time to talk about it.  

Economically stabilize and support family medicine first.  Then let’s talk.

Open Letter to Premier Ford: Fix Family Medicine or Risk Losing the Next Election

Dear Premier Ford,

Just me again, your erstwhile, somewhat (but not completely) humble old country doctor. Like last time, I would point out that I am really not your harshest critic. I want to recognize that you have done much for health care infrastructure over the past few years.

For reasons that I cannot fully explain, the previous Liberal regime simply stopped building the necessary infrastructure to help Ontarians. Whether it was new (badly needed) nursing homes, new hospitals, or new teams, the Liberals basically did, well, nothing in terms of infrastructure. To your credit, you’ve reversed that trend and are building facilities we in Ontario need. (As an aside, you seem to like building things a lot!)

Ontario Premier Doug Ford

But all of that building will not mean much in two years (when the next election is – nudge, nudge, wink, wink) if, as projected, over 25% of Ontarians don’t have a family doctor. Yes, you can correctly point out that the decline in family medicine was caused by the Liberals (it truly was – Eric Hoskins was by far the worst Health Minister I personally have seen in my time in health care). You can point out that the Liberals slashed the capitation model favoured by most family docs that started the downward trend. You can also point out that their favoured Deputy Health Minister Bob Bell thought family medicine was so easy he could return to it after over thirty years away:

Screenshot

He even tried to mansplain one of the true leaders of family medicine on how the system should work.

It’s true Bell and Hoskins were completely wrong. That will NOT matter because by 2026, the general public will say – “well you’ve had 8 years to fix this – you haven’t done enough”. That’s just how politics is, and I think deep down you know that.

You can, truthfully, also say that you are listening to organizations like the Ontario College of Family Physicians or the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) and who continue to go on about how team based care is the future of family medicine and how it can help solve the problem. You may not know this but I was the founding Chair of the Georgian Bay Family Health Team . I happen to believe in physician led team based care.

But here’s the thing. It will take a minimum of five years (if we’re lucky) to build out all those teams. That’s assuming the bureaucrats from the Ministry GET OUT OF THE WAY and let front line family physicians be in charge of the teams. But we are losing family doctors by the week. The people of Ontario can’t wait five years.

There is one thing that can be done now however, to stem the tide, and stabilize the system. You need to give comprehensive care family physicians an immediate, and significant raise. How significant? You will need to give an immediate 35% increase to comprehensive care family docs along with annual normative increases for the next four years. If you think that’s outrageous – I invite you to look at Manitoba’s contract or Saskatchewan’s or British Columbia’s. The competition for comprehensive care family doctors has increased significantly, and Ontario is falling behind.

I can pretty well guess what your “advisors” are telling you. They will say you are in arbitration with the OMA, just promise to abide by the result. Honestly, I do believe you will abide by the result, both this year and next.

But…

Arbitration will take months this year, and months if not a year next year. Frankly, I doubt that the OMA, despite their strong words, will advocate for an increase of the amount necessary for comprehensive family medicine (hopefully I’m wrong).

I have absolutely no doubt that the Arbitrator, William Kaplan, will give a raise to family docs, especially after the recent award to nurses. But if the raise isn’t enough, you going out to the general public in two years and saying “we honoured the arbitrators rulings” – will make zero difference to the close to five million people who won’t have a family doctor. They will still blame you for not having been pro active.

William Kaplan, Chair of the Arbitration Board

Listen, I’m on the conservative side of the political spectrum. I’ve always voted for the Conservatives in every provincial election since I was eligible to vote. I live in Simcoe – Grey which is one of, if not the most strongly conservative ridings in Ontario. Heck, in the early 1990s we were the ONLY riding east of Manitoba to vote for a Reform Party MP.

I’m telling you that most of the voices on the ground are really upset about the lack of family doctors. We have about 7,000 patients without a family doctor in our area last I heard. It’s true that when asked who they will vote for in polls, they, like most recent polls, say they’ll vote conservative. However, they always add “I guess, there’s nobody else out there”. That softness in your vote is a problem, and that softness doesn’t show up in the poll numbers.

Listen, I want you to win the next election. I personally think the NDP would be a complete disaster. I have no faith the Liberals, who showed just how much they hate doctors, have changed their tune. But in order to do that, you’re going to need to bite the bullet, and stem the haemorrhage of family docs.

Go to tell your negotiations team to offer up a deal that strengthens family medicine. Mask the increase with things like retention bonuses (like Manitoba) and matching RRSP payments (like BC) and other methods (paid admin time, paid supervision of team members and pensions would be nice). But get it done ASAP.

Otherwise, I genuinely think you will be in more trouble than you might be led to believe by your handlers in 2026.

Your sincerely,

An old country doctor.

About Asking for Reduced Admin Burden From the MOH….

Lots of talk on the net about how the economic model for family physicians no longer works in 2024. My own blog site has had guest posts dedicated to this issue. There has been some criticism of this position. Dr. Darren Larsen in a reply to the post linked above suggests he is “not seeing or hearing…ideas for solutions“. He further states that all paying doctors more will do is create a “better-paid, unhappy professional. Nothing has changed.”

Others have made the similar comments. There is nothing philosophically wrong with the argument to reduce workload instead of raising pay. Practically speaking however, history has repeatedly taught us that the Ministry of Health (MOH) bureaucracy is incapable of delivering on that promise.

Some personal stories:

In the mid 2010s I was a Peer Lead for OntarioMD (no really!). I was frustrated by the Ontario Lab Information System (OLIS) because I had to manually retrieve all the lab work for a patient individually in their chart. Hospital Report Manager (HRM) by comparison, sends reports on all my patients directly to one inbox. (why we need two systems – and now more, is another story). The then VP of OntarioMD informed me they were working on “Practitioner Query” – which would allow me to get all my lab work from OLIS in one inbox. This was supposed to be ready in six months. That was over a decade ago.

From 2014-2018, thanks to the vision of my colleague Dr. James Lane, we developed an integrated health portal as part of our Health Links project for South Georgian Bay. For $35K a year, we were able to ensure that nursing homes could message physicians on their EMR. We dramatically reduced paperwork for physicians from nursing homes, improved health care outcomes, and reduced hospitalizations thus saving the entire health system money.

The MOH bureaucracy couldn’t wrap its head around this and wouldn’t allow it to continue.

For those of you who think I should have told people about this project, I wrote an article in the Toronto Sun about it. Afterwards, I got invited to do a presentation on this with the then CEO of eHealth Ontario and her senior team. Heck, when I was a keynote speaker at OntarioMDs Every Step conference in 2019 (no really!) I presented this project. The then head of the MOH Digital Health Team was there and heard it. Still, the bureaucracy couldn’t see their way towards allowing a project that saved physician time (and improved health care outcomes) could continue.

Ok, ok, so this blog is just for me to complain about not being listened to right? Well no, there are multiple other examples.

One workload issue for family physicians is keeping track of which of our patients get immunized for which vaccines. If only there was a central tracking system that sent the information to us directly. Wait, there is! The Covax system for tracking Covid vaccinations. Obviously the easiest and most sensible thing to do is expand the already existing system to add all the other vaccines so we get notified (eg when public health gives Gardasil). Yet 3 years after Covax, the MOH can’t even make this simple common sense change.

More? When I was on the SGFP Executive, one of our senior physicians told us the story of how he was on a working group to make the schedule of benefits (the fee schedule for Ontarios doctors) easier. After six months of meetings, they made a decision to add a comma to the descriptive sentence of one code. One comma in an 800 page schedule.

I could go on but you get the point. It’s fine for the MOH to say that that they promise to reduce the Admin burden for family docs. But frankly to these aged and cynical ears, it just sounds like them saying “This time we really mean it, honest!” – kinda like when Lucy promised to hold the football down for Charlie Brown for real this time, with predictable results.

Look, we have a five alarm crisis in family medicine in Ontario. Just about every week brings a story of another physician who is struggling with the economics of running a practice, and is considering quitting.

As with all emergencies, we need to have an effective triage system in place. Deal with the most urgent thing first, then go on to other things. We clearly can’t wait until 2034 for the MOH to implement some of the workload reducing schemes they might have (and no matter how much they promise they really mean it – it will take that long). So the first thing that needs to be done is bring financial stability to family practices so that they can continue to function while we sort out everything else.

Now, given Ontario physicians are in the midst of negotiating a new contract with the Ontario government, I expect the MOH team to say to our own negotiations team something like – “I know you guys want X% increase, but we can only give you 1/2 of that, but we promise to reduce your admin burden so you are working less hard”. I would do the same if I was them.

But, my expectation, and the expectation I think of the majority of doctors in Ontario, would be that the OMA negotiations team looks at the MOH team, and quotes the best engineer in the history of Starfleet to them.

With apologies to Geordi Laforge, B’elana Torres, Trip Tucker, Jett Reno, Andy Billups, and Hemmer – but Scotty was the BEST ENGINEER in the history of Star Trek!

The first step towards fixing the crisis in family medicine is a new physicians service agreement that stabilizes family practices. Once that’s done, work can begin anew on health systems transformation/workload reduction and so on. To try to do it the other way round, or even hand in hand, is a recipe for further collapse of the health care system.

Mark Dermer: On the Ethics of Telling Residents to Avoid Comprehensive Family Medicine

 Recently Maria DiDanieli, a system navigator with the Burlington Family Health Team who holds a Masters in Medical Bioethics, wrote an article criticizing myself, Dr. Silvy Mathew and Dr. Nadia Alam for recommending family medicine residents NOT start a comprehensive care family practices at this time. Dr. Mark Dermer responded so eloquently to that, that I asked his permission to reproduce his response as a guest blogger, and he kindly agreed.

Dr. Mark Dermer, a recently retired family physician whom I’m honoured to have as a guest blogger today.

As a recently retired family physician, I am troubled by the fact that you (Maria DiDanieli) have mistaken the fact that you work adjacent to family doctors as sufficient to understand what they face. Worse, your assessment of Drs. Alam, Gandhi and Mathew is unjust. 

But that’s not why I am commenting. Instead, I am coming at this as someone with some experience in medical ethics, both as a long-time member of community and teaching hospital ethics committees, and as a teacher of medical ethics to family medicine residents. 

To put it simply: Your ethical analysis of my colleagues publishing the opinion piece in question is both facile and flawed. 

I crafted an ABCDEF mnemonic to help residents remember six fundamental principles of medical ethics:

A – the right to Autonomy in decision-making

B – the moral duty of physicians to be adhere to Beneficence when caring for patients

C – the obligation to safeguard patient Confidentiality

D – the patient’s right to receive Disclosure of all information pertaining

E – Equity in dividing finite resources among patient populations

F – First, do no harm (nonmaleficence) 

We then apply these principles to a given situation, understanding that the principles might conflict with one another. It is very rare that a single principle can be used to judge a given question. We also must accept that there are almost never absolute rights and wrongs, just better and worse answers. 

I am confident that we can agree that the current primary care crisis is first and foremost a violation of equity: present circumstances have divided the people who want a family doctor into those who have one and those who don’t. I also expect that you are aware of the evidence that demonstrates that patient outcomes are better when people have an ongoing relationship with a family doctor. 

But you make the elementary mistake of applying a single ethical principle, nonmaleficence, to the matter at hand. Furthermore, you seem unaware that physicians graduating from family medicine programs have been entirely consumed with their training over the previous 5-6 years, nor aware that the medical education system has largely withheld what graduating residents will face as they enter practice. In that light, the letter is a long overdue disclosure that brings transparency to the current state of family medicine. 

That’s right, physicians have the right to disclosure too. We also have rights as people to autonomy, confidentiality and equity. Yet when it comes to our work, we are forced to accept legislated pay and work conditions from a monopoly payer, the government. And the government uses the fact that physicians are independent contractors to justify the fact that we are not entitled to the same cost-of-living increases paid to other health or educational professionals. 

Finally, I think you fail to recognize that in family medicine, we face unusual challenges to persistently align with all the principles of medical ethics, which work best when applied to “cases” (a single patient at a single moment in time). In contrast, family physicians’ work is longitudinal and includes significant responsibility to populations of patients as well as to individuals. That means that we accept short-term harm when we do things like stick vaccination needles in people’s arms or wean them from opioids, understanding that we are looking to provide a net benefit in the medium to long term. 

To my mind, that is precisely what Drs. Alam, Gandhi and Mathew have done. In other words, they are acting very ethically. For while the short-term consequences of their disclosure may accelerate the intensification of the immediate crisis, the sooner the crisis provokes action the sooner we start climbing out of this horrendous hole. 

Dr. Alex Duong: The Challenges Facing an Early-Mid Career Family Physician

Dr. Alex Duong, a family physician from the Vanier district of Ottawa (which amazingly enough is one of the more underserviced areas of Ontario).

Recently, Maria DiDanieli, the clinical lead for system navigation at the Burlington Family Health Team, published an opinion piece in Healthy Debate that was critical of the decision of Drs. Alam/Mathew and yours truly to recommend that family practice residents bide their time instead of starting up a comprehensive care practice in Ontario. Dr. Duong replies and has kindly allowed me to reproduce his reply here.

I am a full-time community family physician, and I read this article with great disappointment.


I am at the face of our health care system. When patients cannot get a timely breast biopsy or a knee replacement, they come to ask me. I address their frustrations, alleviate their pain, and manage expectations.


I am the backstop when issues are missed during transitions in care and issues that require follow up.


I am the navigator that helps patients, and their families orient themselves to housing resources, mental health and financial resources.


I am the advocate for my patient’s health when they deal with their employer or insurance companies.


I do all these things and more, alongside everything from newborn care to palliative medicine.


I, like the great majority of family physicians, take pride in our work, and in what we contribute to our patients and the community at large. But Banks do not grant loans for a new clinic based on my contributions to Ontario’s healthcare system. My rent payments do not decrease because of the positive impact I make on my patients’ lives. The salaries of our exceptional staff are not funded by the sound of clanging pots and pans.


Today, to outfit a new clinic with the minimum number of physicians for a FHO requires high 6 figures to 1 million dollars, loaned at 6.95% interest. We guarantee our own lease – we are on the hook for ensuring it gets paid for the entire term. We are responsible for hiring and ensuring our staff are paid a living wage. We invest our own time in making sure the clinic runs. For many community family physicians like me, there is no assistance for any of this from any level of government. No money for staff, no incentives for starting up, no support for logistics. We are in a precarious, failing business model with ever growing administrative burdens patching the system equal to a part-time job. We have been trying to expound on this, and frankly have been completely unsuccessful in this.


You realize that “… there does not seem to be much political will to improve this situation at this time.” Yet, you ask family physicians to work harder expecting a different result from the government.


You state that “With these current barriers and shifts, any new practice can feel fragile or vulnerable to imminent obsolescence.” Yet, you expect new graduates to take on a massive financial risk: long term lease, EMR contracts, and double their already tremendous debt in start-up costs.


You lament that “Instead of acting as beacons of wisdom, encouragement and level-headed advice, we see a growing shift toward inciting everyone to walk out!”. Do you apply this standard to the teachers in Quebec who recently concluded a strike? Are they less dedicated to their students? Do you apply this standard to all groups who organize to make their voices heard?


The authors, Drs. Alam, Gandhi and Mathew made it clear that there are many options available to new family doctors. They warn of the current state of specifically locking into comprehensive family medicine, to ensure that new grads do not put themselves in a position where they will be burnt out early in their career. To me, leadership requires honest conversations, not empty promises, or exploiting the ideals of new family doctors. I find it unethical to sell a romantic vision of what it is like to start and maintain a Family Medicine practice in the current environment. It is a recipe for moral injury when those ideals run flat into the economic realities, as I have experienced.

And frankly, to say to those of us, like myself, still practicing longitudinal family medicine we should be working harder, or we are just doing family practice wrong is demoralizing. It is grossly offensive to my early-mid career family medicine colleagues who have burnt out through great moral struggle and guilt. Disillusioned family physicians who leave longitudinal family practice will not return. The greater harm to the public and to patients is not the Star article that speaks truth to the issue, but the issue itself: that family physicians, whose concerns are being gaslit, continue to leave longitudinal practices.

Dr. Corli Barnes on the Challenges Facing New Family Physicians

Dr. Corli Barnes , pictured here, guest blogs for me today. She is a Family Practice resident who is just completing her residency. She sent the following letter to the Sudbury media after reading reports about the crisis in family medicine. I thank her for allowing me to reproduce the letter here.

Hi Len,

I read your article about family physicians. I am a second-year family medicine resident here in Sudbury, ON, originally from Manitoba. Thank you for taking the time to help raise awareness about the crisis in Family Medicine. I wanted to write to you to offer a viewpoint not often accounted for in this conversation.

I’m about to graduate as a family physician. After ten years of climbing that Mount Everest, eight of those years without an income, paying for two full-time degrees plus inflation and living costs, I’m $350,000 in debt. That’s living on around $31,000 a year.

The government just denied me loan repayment assistance because I get paid ~$68,500 a year as a resident. The cost to write my final exam just went from around $1,500 to $4,201. When starting a practice, a monthly bill of anywhere from $7,000 to $12,000 in overhead is waiting for most grads who take up a clinic practice, plus ~$2,000 a month in interest on debt if you supported yourself through school.

When I start practice, I can expect the Ministry of Health to take it’s time (at least two months) to approve my funding model. My first paycheck will come in at fee-for-service levels that won’t cover my costs.

About a year and a half ago, after working a 60-hour week, I started to quietly panic when I did the math to project my net income as an attending physician. Clinic-based family medicine is my passion, and I realized that it wasn’t going to work out based on the way most physicians work. I wouldn’t be able to even begin to pay off my debt.

After all that work, sacrificing my twenties, my health, friendships, and enduring the stress of medical training – I wouldn’t be able to cover my living costs as an attending family physician.

Try imagining uprooting your entire life to go on a pilgrimage to a promise land and when you finally get there, it’s a shell of what it once was. A ghost town with worn out buildings and hardly anyone in sight. You’re 10,000 miles from home and way worse off than when you started.

The only promise this journey has fulfilled is providing the education necessary to safely and meaningfully help people who are sick and enable them to seek wellness.

A family doctor is the only professional that is trained adequately to be able to pick out disease from the general population. It is the only medical specialty educated in every body system, who is there to catch those who fall through the cracks, prevent disease, and deliver medicine in a way that suits an individual.

This work will always be challenging and meaningful, requiring dedication to keep up with rapidly increasing medical knowledge and motivation to continue to seek excellence. The challenge is great, and the reward for doing it well – a healthy patient – even greater. This is why I’m passionate about it, and sad to see it fall apart and go unappreciated. It’s hard to watch as its integrity is cheapened by being grouped into an emerging category of primary care providers with far less training and liability, and have its voice drown out by promises of funding that seem to keep ending up in someone else’s pocket.

Because of the way things are, I have had to pivot considerably by coming up with creative ways to practice medicine and supplement in my income in the future.

Many of my peers have elected to do emergency medicine, hospitalist, subspecialize in family medicine or locum while they contemplate their options.

With every news release, I read about funding for health teams, funding for free schooling for nurses, funding for nurse practitioners, funding for “programs to reduce administrative burden” that I have yet to see a benefit of. I open the news everyday, hoping to read something about increased pay for family physicians. Instead, I read about how negotiations are not going well with the government. I read that the planned increase of 2 or 3% has been cut down to 1% or 0%.

Sometimes, it’s hard to not regret going into any number of specialties I could have. I go to work, and I do my best to help the patient in front of me. They ask about where I’m going to practice with hope in their eyes. They leave feeling better, and I try not to think about the fact that for many family physicians, the thanks for that visit is just $12 to take home.

Eventually, fueled by the same determination that got me into medical school, I started to dig deep to find a solution that wouldn’t mean I would have to abandon my dream of opening a clinic-based practice. A solution that wouldn’t mean I have to give up freedom I’ve waited years for, work unsustainable hours or in a toxic environment bred by chronic underfunding.

I scoured Ontario looking for a place that would help fund the start of my career in a meaningful way while having a sustainable business model that supports good medicine. After around a year of this search, I am lucky to have found a place in Madoc, Ontario but I can report that it is a very hard thing to find.

I am sad to be leaving Sudbury, where I currently live and initially hoped to call home when I moved here in 2022. I hope this letter helps to raise awareness about the difficult situation many residents are in and how urgently family physicians need change.