@OntariosDoctors – Page 3 – justanoldcountrydoctor

OMA Does a Disservice to Members with Veiled Threats to Board Candidates

OMA Elections will soon be upon us. This year the possibility of significant change to the organization exists as half of all physician Board Director positions are up for grabs. A review of the OMAs election page shows that there are 58 (!) candidates running for 4 Board positions.

My three loyal readers know that I have long felt that the first and foremost responsibility of the OMA is member advocacy. Many have heard me say time and time again that you cannot have a high functioning health care system without happy, healthy and engaged physicians. The OMA needs to consistently and effectively promote physicians.

Unfortunately the government of the day continues to disrespect physicians by forcing us into a never ending arbitration process. It also, despite the correct warnings of the OMA, continues to expand the scope of practice of non-physicians. I therefore wanted to see which of the Board candidates would be willing to take a more aggressive approach to this issue. So on a bunch of Social Media forums, I posted a request for all Board Candidates to sign a pledge if elected.

#medtwitter Are you a candidate for Board Director of @OntariosDoctors? There are 58 candidates for 4 positions. In order to help me choose my preferred type of candidate – there is a pledge I'm asking all candidates to sign. DM me for details. (spam DMs will be blocked)
— Dr. Sohail Gandhi, MD (@drmsgandhi) December 24, 2024

What exactly was this “pledge”? Was it a demand to remove the compulsory dues that all physicians have to pay to the OMA? Was it to split the OMA into two organizations- one for specialists and one for family doctors like they have in Quebec? A demand to fire certain staff?

Nope. It was a pledge to get data on how much allied health care providers (in this case NPs) cost the health care system when they try to do the work of family physicians. See below:

Now, did I think the culture of the OMA, that has been put in place by and is overseen by the current Board, would be happy with this? Of course not. Despite what my kids tell me, I’m not that out of touch. I expected some sort of push back suggesting this was (in their view) inappropriate.

But I confess I was taken aback by not only the factual errors in their response, but what quite frankly can only reasonably be perceived to be a veiled threat to myself and Board candidates. Here’s a copy of what I got:

The first factual error is to conflate the governance transformation (which I supported, and still do) with the elections process. The governance transformation was about reducing the size of the Board, and making it electable by and therefore responsible to the membership as a whole. This is opposed to the mishmash of ways people got on the Board before. It was also about sunsetting OMA Council (which had long served it’s purpose) and putting in a better, more co-operative General Assembly system, along with a Priorities and Leadership group to advance the needs of the members.

I did, and continue to support all of that (trust me, the old system was much worse). BUT – that is completely separate from the elections process itself. The intense over regulation of what candidates can and cannot say or how they can act during elections is NOT governance transformation, it’s micromanagement.

The second error is to suggest that it is because of my previous role at the OMA that I am “viewed as a leader”. Apart from the obvious fact that I have a bunch of detractors, the blunt reality is that there are a whole lot of ex-OMA Presidents out there who would not have influence because of the title itself. They have influence because of who they are/what they advocate for/actions they take outside of any past title.

The email to OMA Board Director candidates was almost as bad:

The underlying message is quite clear. Sure you can run for Board Director. BUT, if in OUR opinion, you “campaign”, or take a position WE don’t like, or speak out of turn – WE disqualify you. Intentionally or not, it creates the impression that the organization only wants a certain kind of Board Director. Not a strong independent type who can think on their own, and, dare I say it, take a bold stance that perhaps requires come chutzpah (like signing the pledge would!) But rather a benign, meek, Board Director – who will simply rubber stamp what’s been presented to them.

Unacceptably, in my view, is the more subtle threat of damaging our careers. The comment that this is”not in keeping with OMA’s code of conduct and civility”can really only be viewed as a veiled threat. Charging someone under a code of conduct violation has the potential to be extremely damaging. Many physicians, when they apply for new positions have to answer questions like “are they now under investigation” for such and such, even if there has not been a ruling yet. Being charged with this would force them to answer yes and potentially damage career options.

To be clear, I actually support the code of conduct and civility. I saw in the aftermath of the miserable 2017 tPSA debacle some incredibly unprofessional comments made towards the OMA staff (and others). I also am aware of many instances since where staff have been verbally abused by members and that is completely unacceptable. The staff are a very hard working bunch – who follow the direction and the culture the Board puts in place. It’s the Board that should be – respectfully – held into account.

But to tell a potential Board Director candidate (and me) that stating an opinion that might be viewed as controversial and advocating for that as part of an election process might see them charged?? Especially when there was absolutely no foul/derogatory/demeaning language used in the posts? Sorry but that simply comes across as attempting to censor a view point that you don’t happen to like. And that’s just wrong. Worse, it gives credence to the many critics of the policy who feared it would be used to suppress discussion.

Members deserve a strong, independent thinking and bold OMA Board. An elections process that goes to these extremes to prevent candidates from taking a stand on issues, advertising to members their skills (or lack thereof!) and their philosophy does not serve the membership at all. It will only disenfranchise them and lead to more voter apathy. About the only thing members can do at this point is NOT vote for any incumbents for Board Director and hope that will trigger some changes to this process.

As for me, I will try to get through the elections material – and pick candidates who I think will work to change the organization for the better. I will let you know my thoughts in a later blog.

OMA’s Recent Messages to Family Physicians are Disappointing and Misleading

Last week, Alberta, the province that once had a health Minister who went to a physicians house to berate him in person, created a new pay model for their family physicians. Even Alberta, the province whose premier told the health service to not talk about vaccines, realized the obvious. Family physicians need to be paid commensurate to the foundational work they do, and the role they play, in a high functioning health system.

Alberta Premier Danielle “Covid? What Covid?” Smith

I’ve taken a look at the new Alberta model. Some of the specifics are gated but the rough overall numbers are public. My back of napkin math suggests there is about a 24% increase in gross income for family physicians with a practice size of 1200. This includes payments for indirect work (checking labs, reviewing reports, supervising staff – all the admin work that Ontario refuses to recognize) and increased payments for more complex patients. I congratulate my colleagues in Alberta on this accomplishment. It WILL stabilize not only family medicine, but their whole health care system.

In response OMA CEO Kimberly Moran sent out an email on Friday Dec 20th. (A complete guess on my part is that she saw some of the responses to this deal on Social Media). I personally was offended (but not surprised) by the manipulation of figures and data in her email. While it’s true that every thing she wrote in the email was technically correct, the manner in which it was presented created an impression of successes that just aren’t there when it comes to advocating for family physicians.

I hate to talk numbers, this stuff gets confusing. But here’s a short set of data you need to know (numbers rounded for simplicity).

2022/23 is the BASE YEAR for all future increases negotiated/arbitrated going forward
The 2022/23 physicians budget was $16 billion
For 2023/24 (the last year of the previous agreement) the OMA negotiated a 2.8% ($448 million) increase
for 2024/25 the Arbitrator awarded us 9.95% compounded to the 2.8% from 2023/24 – which winds up being 13.03% more than the BASE YEAR ($2.08 Billion more than 2022/23)

So what’s the problem? Well for starters Ms. Moran states that the OMA “successfully” advocated for a 9.95% increase without mentioning that the OMA asked for 22.9%. Getting less than half of what you ask for is successful? But more importantly she went on to tell family physicians that they will receive a higher increase than the arbitration award of 9.95%. (11.75 – 13.54% depending on the practice model). But here’s the thing, the arbitration award was the increase for one year only (2024/25). The increase that family doctors are getting is an increase from the BASE YEAR (2022/23) – so it reflects your increase for two years not one like the arbitration award. The two year increase to the physicians budget is, as mentioned above 13.02%.

Now I completely respect the fact that the numbers that I’m quoting do not reflect the fact that the the award is meant to be split 70/30 between fee increases and targeted funds (but neither did Ms. Moran’s email!!). A very brief summary of how targeted funds are supposed to work:

70% of the $2.08 billion are supposed to go to fee increases ($1.456 billion)
the other 30% is supposed to be targeted ( $624 million)
of the $1.456 billion, 25% ($364 million) is supposed to go to across the board (ATB) increases for everybody. Crunching the numbers means everyone gets a 2.27% increase to their 2022/23 (BASE YEAR) income. The rest of the increase is based on relativity. Ophthalmologists for example get an additional 0.18% for relativity, and family doctors get between 9.48 – 11.27% additional for relativity. But again – that’s the increase for TWO YEARS, whereas the 9.95% was just for the one year.

This type of sophistry in messaging from the OMA regarding family medicine is sadly all too common. For example, the OMA has said that Ontario Family doctors have the highest capitation rates in Canada. Is that statement true? Of course it is. BUT – what’s also true is that no other province has deductions for outside use. Also, at a bare minimum family physicians in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and Manitoba (with Manitoba being on top) pay family physicians more. Maybe Nova Scotia as well. Ignoring that while trumpeting higher overall capitation payments is unsettling.

While I sadly did expect such sleight of hand over numbers from OMA central, I must admit I was very disappointed in the SGFP email that came shortly thereafter. The SGFP has recently really gotten quite a bit stronger at advocating for family doctors and done some good work. But even they sadly fell into the trap when SGFP Chair Dave Barber told members in his letter:

“…Family doctors will receive increases greater than the 9.95% arbitration award announced earlier this year”.

David Barber – Chair of the Section of General and Family Practice

Again, technically a true statement, but very inappropriate. I don’t know what he was thinking signing off on that.

The really sad thing is that it didn’t have to be this way. The OMA (and SGFP) could have been completely forthright and honest and simply laid out the facts as I did above. This still shows family doctors getting a relativity bump more than a lot of other specialties. And they could have said that they want a good chunk of the targeted funds to go to Family Medicine but the government continues to fight them. Finally, they could have blamed the government for not recognizing the seriousness of the crisis. All of that still would have talked about the positive work being done, without creating the impression that they were trying to hoodwink the members. But alas……

What can we done? Well, I’ve said it many times before. Only the members can change the OMA if they want to. This year in particular, four physician members are up for election for Board Director – which represents half of all the physician positions. There are also multiple candidates running for SGFP executive positions. This really represents the best opportunity in a long time to continue to change the culture at the OMA so that we don’t get disingenuous messaging like this.

I’ll have my thoughts on the election in an upcoming blog.

Arbitration Part IV: What to Make of the New, Updated Payment Schedule

Disclaimer: The payment schedule below is based on my personal analysis of information from the OMA as of December 6, 2024. It would not surprise me if there were more changes. Do NOT use this as your sole source of planning. Contact info@oma.org with any questions.

On Nov. 1, 2024, OMA Board Chair Dr. Cathy Faulds announced an update on how the arbitration award for Year I of our PSA (Fiscal 2024/25) is going to be paid out. The plan was to have final numbers in a couple of weeks. Follow up information didn’t come until December 6 in an OMA news alert. Some things never change.

Wait old country doctor! Didn’t you already do a blog on the Arbitration Award?

Yes, parts two and three of my Arbitration analysis did say what was planned. But the blogs were filled with with statements like “allegedly” “supposedly” and chances of some of the changes happening were “slim to none”.

So we read all your previous work for nothing?

At the risk of sounding somewhat less than humble – most to the stuff I wrote about has come to pass – including splitting the increase with 75% of the amount going towards relativity, and 25% for across the board (ATB) raises.

Well what changed then?

There are a couple of delays (of course) to some of the retroactive payments. But the big change is changing the amount of your increase based on your specialty. I don’t know who came up with the idea of doing this, and suggested it to the OMA’s Negotiations Task Force, but whoever it was deserves the thanks of our profession.

This method is not perfect, because some billing codes are used by more than one speciality. For example, I’m a family physician, but I do joint injections. So do orthopaedic surgeons and rheumatologists. But the billing code (and thus payment) for doing a joint injection is the same. Applying an increase to that code will affect at least three specialties. Therefore, by given specialty specific increases instead, some of the lower relativity specialists will get more of an increase sooner.

The “permanent” changes to the fee codes will now not happen until April 2026 (!!). So expect your income to fluctuate some more then.

Don’t tell me you’re are going to toss large numbers and calculations at me!

I’m going to toss large numbers and calculations at you.

Here are numbers I needed to understand the contract. Numbers rounded for simplicity.

Fiscal Year 2022/23 is the base year for calculations. Physicians budget was $16 billion.
2.8% increase agreed to for 2023/2024 (from last PSA) = $448 million
9.95% awarded by arbitrator for 2024/2025 when compounded with 2023/2024 – total value =$2.085 billion
The plan was to spend 70% on fee increases, and 30% on “targeted” investments. For 2023/2024 this would be $314 million for fee increases, $134 million for targeted investments. For 2024/25 – $1.460 billion for increases, $625 million for targets.
Finally, as of now, it appears that we are going to stick to 25% of the total for fee increases (not the targeted money) will go to across the board (ATB) raises, and the rest based on relativity.

Wait a minute Old Country Doctor – didn’t everyone get the same percentage increase this year?

Yes. Under the terms of a previous agreement, if the OMA and government were not able to sort out how to divide the money for a fiscal year, ALL of it would be paid ATB on a temporary basis. Emphasis on temporary. So we all got a 2.8% increase for 2023/2024 (you should have gotten the retroactive pay in November). Additionally your monthly remittance should be 2.8% higher beginning on the MAY 2024 statement (The increase took effect April 1, but of course, that gets paid out on May 15).

For this fiscal year (2024/25) the OMA and government have conceded they won’t come up with a plan on how to divide the funds, and so everyone will get an ATB of 13%(1.028 x 1.0995). The way it’s paid out will be a mix of monthly increases and some retroactive pay.

However for fiscal 2025/2026, there will be specialty specific increases. Each physician will get another temporary increase in their billings, based on their specialty. The OMA and government will continue to ~~argue~~ negotiate. Probably need arbitration for this. The exact fee code changes are scheduled to be in place April 1, 2026 (!!)

You’re going to bring back Drs. Alpine and Valley to explain this aren’t you?

Of course dear reader. It helps to put a “face” to the numbers. However, on this occasion, let’s assume Dr. Alpine is an ophthalmologist (speciality chosen only because they appear to get the lowest increase) and Dr. Valley is a family doctor in a capitation model (for reasons that will become clear shortly).

I won’t restate the assumptions for my calculations (please refer to my previous blog on this issue). Assuming that Drs Alpine and Valley see the exact same number of patients every year – this is what their gross income will look like.

Time Period	Dr. Alpine	Dr. Valley
Monthly billings 22/23	$100,000	$30,000
Monthly billings 23/24 (increase not applied yet)	$100,000	$30,000
Monthly billings April 2024 till Dec 2024 (2.8% finally applied)	$102,800	$30,840
Nov 15, 2024 (retroactive pay added)	One time payment of $33,600 in retroactive pay for 23/24	One time payment of $10,080 in retroactive pay for 23/24
Jan 15, 2025 – 2.8% lowered to 2.55% as part of agreement to use funds to increase HOCC	$102,550	$30,765
Feb 15, 2025- April 15, 2025 – OHIP will finally given 1.0995 on top of the 1.0255 now	$112, 754	$33,826
May 15, 2025 retroactive pay for April -December	One time payment of $89,583	One time payment of $27,549
May 2025 – April 2026 monthly billings	$102,452	$33,525

WAIT A MINUTE! Capitated Family Doctors gross will go down as well??

Yes. As mentioned above, for 2023/24 and 2024/2025 the OMA and government could not agree how to divide up the now $2.085 billion, so it was given ATB on a temporary basis. This was meant to get some money into doctors hands sooner otherwise Allah/God/Yahweh only knows how long we would have to wait for the process to complete.

However, 30% of the $2.085 billion (or $626 million) was meant for “targeted funds”. The expectation is either through negotiation (very unlikely IMO) or through arbitration, a decision will be made on where to spend that $626 million for fiscal 2025/26.

Therefore, there is only $1.459 billion for general increases for 2025/26 (plus whatever increase the arbitrator gives us). Of that, 25% ($365 million) will go ATB. So everyone will get 2.03%. The remaining $1.094 billion is distributed via relativity.

With less money to distribute – well, there is less of an increase. Now of course the possibility exists that some of the targeted funds will be spent on captitated family medicine too, but who knows at this point? This is why virtually every specialty sees a decline in 2025 when you look at the OMA’s spreadsheet.

Keep in mind the fee increases for April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2028 have yet to be negotiated (more likely arbitrated) so there will be more money in the future – we hope.

I’m not a family doctor or an ophthalmologist- how do I find out my numbers?

I suggest you go to the table that the OMA has prepared for you. Use your base 2022/23 monthly income to figure out your projected numbers. If you have specific questions about your situation, I urge you to contact info@oma.org. The organization can’t really answer questions if they don’t know what they are. Also please register for the live Zoom Webinar on this process, and ask your questions there.

So this is the final word on this issue?

Nope. I suspect there will be more to come. And that it will be just as confusing.

You’re just a bundle of joy Old Country Doctor.

I aim to please dear reader. I aim to please.

Sunday Snippets – November 10, 2024

Another in a weekly series of brief snippets of health care stories that bemused, intrigued and otherwise beguiled me over the past week along with my random thoughts on the matter.

Item: An article in the College of Family Physicians of Canada Journal suggests that “recycling” physicians would help address family physician shortages. This includes “Physicians who have had successful careers in general surgery, emergency medicine, family medicine, hospitalist practices, and other specialties…”

My thoughts: Sigh. I get that the Journal is trying to be open to all views to stir discussion. I get that we are in a family practice crisis in all of Canada right now and looking at unique ways of helping. But seriously – you want to turn a retired general surgeon into a pseudo family doctor? Do you realize just how much you are denigrating family physicians by writing that a good chunk of their jobs can be replaced by people who haven’t done the residency? Some ideas belong in the trash heap and this one deserves to go there. Comprehensive care family physicians CANNOT BE REPLACED by anyone other than another properly trained comprehensive care family physician.

Item: It seems that Quebec is looking to find ways to force doctors to stay in the province and work in their public health system. They are even willing to as far as considering to use the Notwithstanding clause in the Constitution (which they would have to, as their initial position impinges on freedom of movement/assembly to make this happen).

My thoughts: It really does kill me to use Star Wars memes instead of Star Trek ones (really and truly). But once again, for this issue – I’m going to quote Star Wars character Princess Leia:

I honestly don’t know what to do with politicians anymore. There is ample, repeated, overwhelming evidence that whenever they pick fights with physicians, they inevitably lose and health care suffers. And yet they keep doing it.

Item: Dr. Corli Barnes (who I was honoured to have as a guest blogger) wrote in McLean’s Magazine (cover story no less!) about why she moved to Madoc, Ontario and the incentives they provided. I understand she took less than what is listed in the article’s headline, but there were incentives.

My thoughts: I’m happy for Dr. Barnes. I’m happy for the people in her community as well, as they are going to get healthcare from a dedicated family physician and their well being will improve as a result. But I really do wish that our system was no so fragmented and that all communities could offer a consistent level of support to their family physicians.

Item: Premier Doug Ford told patients with minor illnesses not to go to the ER. In response, Drs. Drummond and Venugopal had an op ed where they point out that the Premier is not qualified to determine what is an Emergency.

My thoughts: This will surprise some of you who know that I personally favour the Tommy Douglas model of health care, which supports user fees to dissuade misuse of the health care system. However, that is frankly up to the patients to decide for themselves. Drs. Drummond and Venugopal are correct in saying that politicians are not qualified to hand out medical advice, and should not be saying stuff like this.

Item: A study out of Michigan suggests that more virtual care will not lead to more unnecessary testing. A huge concern has been that if you cannot see a patient in person to assess this, a physician would be more likely to order a test “just to be sure”. This study suggests no.

My thoughts: I think the big flaw of this study is that it looked at patients who were in existing practices getting virtual care from their own physicians. There is a HUGE difference between getting care from your own physician virtually, or getting it virtually from someone you have never met before on some fancy looking app. The two are not the same and it would be very interesting to see how many unnecessary tests are done when there isn’t a pre-existing physician/patient relationship.

Item: Amina Zafar had an excellent piece in the CBC writing about how poorly managed your medical information is. She builds on the story of Greg Price, an unfortunate 31 year old who died of testicular cancer, when he probably shouldn’t have. She writes how this mismanagement of health care information is common in Canada.

My thoughts: Yes, yes, yes, a thousand times yes. As far as I’m concerned, the mismanagement of health IT should be the number one issue to be addressed in health care. It creates countless inefficiencies in our health care system. It creates all sorts of admin burden. It leads to much higher expenditures and duplicate testing. This needs to get fixed ASAP.

Item: The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) announced that nominations are open for their annual election periods. Up for grabs are four Board Director positions and many other District and Section positions.

My thoughts: Physicians in Ontario desperately need a strong OMA. The only way that can happen is if front line physicians stand up and take positions. I’ll be frank (and will offend a bunch of people) – but when I was on the Board there were too many Board Directors who clearly were in it for their own self interest and were not thinking of their colleagues. The same could be said for some other elected reps. We will get the OMA we deserve, but only if front line docs take a leading role.

Ontario Government to Family Doctors: The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

That we have a family medicine crisis in Ontario is indisputable. That the numbers of family doctors leaving comprehensive care family medicine continues to rise and is expected to leave over 4 million people without a family doctor in the next couple of years is irrefutable. That the need to recruit and retain comprehensive care family doctors has never been more urgent especially as competition from provinces like British Columbia, Manitoba and others increases is unquestionable.

All of this is self evident to anybody following health care.

People lined up in Kingston desperately hoping to get a family doctor when a new clinic opened (image first put out by the CBC)

Except of course, the Ontario Government, and their Ministry of Health Bureaucrats. As far as they are concerned, now is actually the perfect time to attack family doctors. Because, you know, the way to improve burnout, morale and encourage them to take on new patients is to ambush people who are already under siege with overwhelming workloads.

Here’s what happened. About 6,000 family doctors in Ontario practice under what is called a Family Health Organization (FHO) model. Think of it as a base salary plus performance bonuses. As part of working in that model, the family doctors have to sign a contract agreeing to deliver a basket of services, including, a certain amount of after hours care.

Because we have so many rural areas in Ontario, where family doctors do a whole bunch of other work (emergency department, hospital on call, palliative care, long term care on call and more), there is a provision in the contract that says if you have X number of family doctors doing this kind of work already, then the amount of after hours care you provide as a FHO can be reduced. There’s a somewhat complicated formula but that doesn’t really matter – it’s the principle that counts. Essentially, if you are already doing after hours work – then you are not asked to do more after hours work.

Unless of course you are a Ministry of Health bureaucrat, taking the guidance of your bellicose negotiations team that said there was “no concern” about a shortage of family physicians. This allows you licence to use a stick against family physicians.

Then, you send letters to 75 FHOs telling them they are not meeting the terms of their contract, based on made up metrics. The letters (I’ve seen a few of them) all allege that the doctors in the FHOs are not living up to the terms of their contract.

Let’s be 100% clear on this. If a physician signs a contract as part of a FHO, they should hold up their end of the bargain. You should read the contract, go in with your eyes open, and make sure you are capable of meeting all of the terms that you agreed to.

BUT.

It appears what the Ministry is arbitrarily and unilaterally determining how to decide if a physician is meeting the terms. For example, one FHO letter I saw suggested that that FHO was not performing as well as its “peers” and was therefore targeted. Two things though. First the Ministry unilaterally decided who the peers were. Second, performing up to the standards of your peers was not part of the original contract.

Another letter I saw alleged that the doctors who do call for their hospital or their nursing home, don’t qualify because……they don’t bill enough for going into the hospital. The ministry unilaterally decided that in order to claim after hours work, you couldn’t just be on call, but you had to keep going into the hospital when on call, a certain number of times (this number was never up for discussion before).

I’ll use myself as an example. Last Wednesday I was on call for my hospital. I got three calls (one at 4:00 am!) and managed all the patients over the phones. I DID perform the task I agreed to (being on call). But the bungling bureaucrats won’t acknowledge that. They want me go to the hospital (even if I can handle it over the phone) and then bill OHIP for the service (which would drive UP the cost!!) to be recognized – a decision they seemingly made on their own, without consultation.

My two loyal fans and one non-fan regular reader know that I’ve long maintained that Star Trek is a far better franchise than Star Wars. But in this case, I will concede the Ministry’s actions are most appropriately compared to this fellow:

Normally when a government changes the terms of an agreement unilaterally, one would expect the Ontario Medical Association to step in and advocate for their members. However, the response from the OMA, in a letter sent to all its members was, frankly, pathetic. The letter basically told doctors to “notify the Ministry” about the circumstances around your group. Try to reason with Darth Vader as it was. No dedicated email or legal team staff member either. Just contact the general help email.

I guess specialists who had expressed concerns on Social Media about too many family doctors on the OMA Board have nothing to worry about. Clearly the OMA, between allowing the across the board increases to the arbitration award this year and not dedicating resources to tackle this issue cares nothing about family medicine. (They talk a great game on social media, but it’s the actions that count).

I imagine the issue will eventually sort itself out after many rancorous meetings and back and forth – all of which will take up physicians time and prevent them from doing minor and inconsequential things like, say, seeing patients. The Ministry will continue to claim that we have more family doctors than ever before – but let’s face it, if they keep behaving like this, those doctors won’t practice comprehensive care medicine. It just seems so ridiculous, and indicative of a Ministry that truly doesn’t understand or value family medicine.

And that should frighten the general public more than the Death Star ever did. (Drat, made ANOTHER Star Wars reference).

The original Death Star from Stars Wars, Episode IV: A New Hope

Arbitration Part III: When and How Much Will Docs Get Paid?

Disclaimer: The information is based on my personal analysis and should not be your sole source of information. The payment schedule below is based on what we were told was “PLANNED”. Being a firm believer in “Murphy’s Law“, I would suggest that changes to the below may come at any time. Contact info@oma.org with any questions.

After writing why the Arbitration Award will be bad for patients and doctors, it seems my three loyal readers were unhappy that I couldn’t say when docs would be paid. Being a demure, sensitive, and eager to please sort, I feel compelled to try my best to explain when money is coming.

Once again, my two examples are Drs. Alpine and Valley. Both had 13 years of post secondary education (4 years for a BSc, 4 years for medical school and 5 years for residency). Dr. Alpine does a lot of procedures and can see more patients than he could 20 years ago due to improved technology. Dr. Valley spends a lot of time with intensively sick patients, so she sees the same number of patients as 20 years ago.

What assumptions am I making for the Calculations?

Drs. Alpine and Valley will each provide same number of OHIP services yearly from 2023 – 2026. We have to assume that the entire 2.8 % increase from last year, and the 9.95% award this year will be given across the board (ATB) until April 1, 2025. (The OMA and MOH could reach an agreement on distributing the funds more fairly- but I highly doubt it). We’ll also assume that the schedule for payments the OMA provided at their webinar will be met – I remain very skeptical.

Let’s assume Dr. Alpine billed OHIP an average of $100,000 a month for fiscal 2022/23 and Dr. Valley billed OHIP $30,000 a month. This time period is the base rate for OMA calculations, and hence mine. (Physicians who read this blog can put their average 2022/23 monthly billings into the calculations below to find out their own numbers).

What happened for April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024?

The OMA and MOH agreed to a 2.8% increase in fees that was to be divided into across the board (ATB) increases and relativity increases. Because the agreement came late, and the OHIP Computers couldn’t be updated (sigh), Drs. Alpine and Valley continued to bill OHIP at the same rate as 2022/23.

What happened on April 1, 2024?

The OHIP computers finally updated to reflect the previous year’s increase. Since the two sides didn’t agree on a relatively formula, the 2.8% was given ATB. Dr. Alpine’s gross income went to $102,800 a month. Dr. Valley’s went to $30,840. Both increases showed up on the May Remittance. Doubtful Dr. Valley even noticed her increase.

What will happen on the Nov. 2024 Remittance ?

Well, finally all the reviewing and rejecting and re-submitting of claims for the year April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 will have happened. The computers will then pay the retroactive 2.8% amount of this year to the doctors. Dr. Alpine will get an additional $33,600 (1.028 x $100,000 x 12) on his remittance for retroactive pay. Dr. Valley will get $10,080 (1.028 x $30,000 x 12).

Isn’t there a drop beginning in December 2024?

The increase drops to 2.55% and the funds saved are dedicated to enhancing the Hospital On Call Coverage program (HOCC). Dr. Alpine will now see $102,550 (1.0255 x $100,000 and Dr. Valley will start to get $30, 765 (1.0255 x $30,000).

What happens for the January – March 2025 Remittance Advice?

Allegedly, the OHIP computers will be able to apply the 9.95% increase for this year now (I’ll believe it when I see it). The word “prospective payment” was used in the webinar, but I don’t know what that means. This increase is compounded to the now 2.55% from the previous year. As a result, starting with the January remittance, Dr. Alpine will now get $112,753.73 ( 1.0255 x 1.0995 x $100,000) a month from OHIP. Dr. Valley will be at $33,826.12 a month.

What is supposed to happen on the March 2025 Remittance?

What’s that you say? Wasn’t the 9.95% increase supposed to start on April 1, 2024? So what happened to all that money? Well, according to the OMA you will get a lump sum payment for April to December in the March remittance. Dr. Alpine can expect to see a one time retroactive payment of $89,583. 57 ($112,753.73 that he should have gotten subtracting the $102,800 that he did get, multiplied by 9 months) and Dr. Valley will get $26,875.08. This is in addition to their usual remittance.

OK, What Happens After April 1, 2025?

Well at this point the new ‘permanent’ fees are supposed to kick in. Up until now, everyone has been given ATB increases. Whatever is negotiated or arbitrated, is supposed to start now. However, the base rate will be the 2022/23 rates. In a previous blog, I assumed that we would carry on the process of giving 1/4 of the increase as ATB and 3/4 via relativity. IF this is done (not sure if it will be) then every speciality will get 2.46% (0.7% for last year + 1.75% this year, compounded) plus X percent – with the X varying from speciality to specialty based on relativity.

Let’s assume Dr. Alpine’s speciality got an X=0% and that Dr. Valley’s got X = 17.54%. In that case Dr. Alpine will now get $102,460 a month:

$100,000 base rate from 2022/23 x (1.0246 ATB increase + 0 for relativity).

Dr. Valley on the other hand will get $36,000 a month:

$30,000 base rate from 2022/23 x (1.0246 ATB +.1754 for relativity).

I imagine Dr. Alpine will be annoyed.

What are the chances of the new fees being ready on April 1, 2025?

Slim to none. Militancy on the part of the MOH and incompetence on the part of bureaucrats in charge of OHIP are two constants as sure as death and taxes.

Um…well what happens to our monthly incomes after April 1, 2025?

I honestly can’t figure that part out (and not for lack of trying). The procedural agreement states:

“Any unexpended portion of the targeted price increases will continue to be paid to physicians as a separate payment on the monthly Remittance Advice until such time as each targeted increase is implemented or unless the parties agree otherwise.”

This is the part that I think most people have missed (including, frankly, the OMA Board that approved this agreement – and yes I know it was an attempt to get real money in the hands of physicians). It’s one thing to accept 2.8% ATB. But to accept 12.75% ATB (2.55% from last year compounded with 9.95% from this year) is a bit much. You really have to wonder if there wasn’t a fairer way to spend this money, especially with so many Dr. Valley’s struggling. Time will tell what happens here.

Geez old country doctor, all you’ve done is fuzzify the muddification!

I aim to please dear reader. I aim to please.

SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS ONLY

Those of you who have read my blogs know that I (and many others) are really really upset with College of Family Physicians of Canada for inviting Dr. David Price to be a keynote speaker at the Family Medicine Forum. I view it as a slap in the face to family physicians, given his role on the Ontario Government’s Negotiations Team.

The Ontario Union of Family Physicians would seem to agree with me. They are asking all family physicians to sign the petition below to have Dr. Price removed as a Keynote speaker. PLEASE click on this link to read and I encourage you to sign.

Arbitration Part II: Award Implementation Will Hurt Physicians/Patients

Disclaimer: The information below is based on what a non-lawyer (i.e. me) was able to sort out after reading the OMA and Ministry’s 2024-2028 Procedural Agreement, the OMA Legal Counsel’s summary of the award, and attending the OMA Zoom session on the award. This may not be accurate (and I will correct the blog if more relevant information becomes available). I encourage all OMA members to contact the OMA directly with specific questions (info@oma.org) and not rely on this blog as your sole source of information.

OMA Negotiations Counsel Howard Goldblatt

The Numbers

First, let’s again review the numbers (approximated for simplicity).

Physician Services Budget, fiscal year ending March 2024: $16 Billion +

Arbitration Award: 9.95% – approximately $1.6 billion

OMA/MOH agreement on split of funds: 70% ($1.12 Billion) to fee increases and 30 %( $480 million) to targeted programs.

Previous contract (no guarantee this will repeat): 25% of the fee increases ($280 million) would go to across the board (ATB) fee increases for entire profession. The remainder ($840 million) would be distributed on the basis of relativity (giving more of a raise to low earning specialties and less to higher earning specialties). IF this pattern repeats, this equals a 1.75% increase for everyone. Then each specialty would get assigned an additional percentage (let’s say X) based on relativity. Ergo everyone should get 1.75% + X, where X varies from zero (for high billers) to higher (for lower billers).

The Implementation

According to the OMA webinar, the OMA and Ministry have yet to agree how to distribute the award. Mediation starts early October and all of this might wind up in Arbitration in March of 2025. My sense from watching the webinar is they are not close on an agreement.

So what happens to the money for this year? We are all supposed to get a raise now right? Well, that’s when the procedural agreement takes effect. It states (sorry for the legalese):

The Year 1 price increase will be implemented as follows:
a. The entire price increase under the Year 1 2024-28 PSA will be implemented
prospectively as an across-the-board increase to the fee-for-service payments
identified in paragraph 1a above, with a target date of the RA in the month 90
days following the issuance of the arbitration decision, and will flow through to
non-fee-for-service payments as soon as practicable.
b. A lump sum payment equal to the entire increase awarded for Year 1 for the
earlier period from April 1, 2024 through to the implementation date under
paragraph 12(a), will be paid as soon as practicable following the arbitration
award with a target date of October 2024.
c. To the extent practicable, the permanent year 1 non-targeted price increases
will be implemented at the same time as the April 1, 2023, price increases
under Year 3 of the of the 2021-24 PSA i.e. April 1, 2025, and in any event no
later than October 1, 2025. These increases will be calculated on a base of
2023-2024 expenditures …… The distribution as between across the board increases and relativity increases will be determined in such manner as the parties agree or, failing agreement, as the board of arbitration awards….

OMA staff confirmed at the webinar that this is in fact what will happen. They even had a complex schedule of prospective payments/lump sum payments/retroactive payments and so on that left me, frankly in need of high doses of Zofran.

To try and simplify things, let’s look at how this will affect two doctors.

Meet Drs. Alpine and Valley

Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley both completed four years of an undergraduate degree. They then completed four years of medical school, and each did a five year residency in the field of their choosing. Dr. Alpine was always someone who liked to “do stuff”. He wound up in a speciality that does a lot of procedures and as technology has improved, has been able to treat more patients in a day than his specialty could 20 years ago.

Dr. Valley, who is no less smart, really enjoys patient interaction. She chose a specialty that requires more intensive time with patients, and as such, is not able to see more people in a day than someone in her field could 20 years ago.

With our aging population and increasingly complex health care needs – both Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley are swamped and have long waiting lists.

Dr. Alpine, was able to bill OHIP $1 million for fiscal year ending March 2024. This represents his gross income, and to be fair, his office has a lot of leased medical equipment, along with staff that he has to pay for out of that $1 million. Dr. Valley billed OHIP $350 thousand for fiscal year ending March 2024. She too has staff and other overhead expenses, but not as much equipment.

What happens to Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley under the procedural agreement? While the schedule for payments for the award is a convoluted mess, the reality is that for the fiscal year ending March 2025 – Dr. Alpine will gross $1.1 million, and Dr. Valley will gross $385,000.

Now the OMA states that the goal is to have new permanent fees in place based on relativity and targeted funding for April 1, 2025. The ONLY way this could happen is if the government negotiations team completely capitulates its positions in the next couple of weeks. Seriously people, the schedule shows that if there is no agreement this thing goes to Arbitration in early March 2025. IF that happens, it’s part and parcel of Arbitration for the 2-4 years of the contract. So the Arbitrator probably won’t even make a ruling until September 2025. Then another six months to re program the ancient OHIP computers and while the fees may be retroactive to April 1, 2025, you likely won’t see the money until Spring 2026.

Let’s assume that the arbitrator follows the precedent set where 1/4 of the increase ( $280 million) should indeed be ATB, and then distributes the rest based on relativity. And let’s assume that Dr. Alpine’s speciality was assigned an X of 0% and Dr. Valley got an X of 18.25%. Therefore Dr. Alpine for the fiscal year ending March 2026 will gross $1.0175 million – a reduction of $82,500 dollars from the year before. While Dr. Valley will get bumped to $420,000.

No matter how often the OMA reminds people that the increase for the first year is one time only, and NOT a permanent increase, the reality is that many members will have budgeted around their increase, and Dr. Alpine will, be very miffed at a $82,500 reduction in income for doing the same work.

But it’s not all that great for Dr. Valley either. She will have missed one year of a substantial increase that should have gone to her earlier. Not only that, but her offices cost pressures and admin workload have been skyrocketing. She needs the stability a relativity based formula provides right now, not in March of 2026.

Because of the delay in stabilizing her practice, she actually chose to leave her practice and do a different kind of medicine. Her patients now have to go back on a waiting list, and who knows when they can find someone to take over their care.

I understand why this procedural agreement was put in place. It was to ensure that doctors got a much need cash injection sooner rather than later. But unfortunately there are unintended consequences of this and those are coming to fruition. Specialists like Dr. Valley who need the relativity increases right now will not be able to hold out and may leave their practices. Dr. Alpine will be understandably miffed at the yoyoing of his income.

And all of this uncertainty will do nothing to help the health care system.

The Arbitration Award: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

On Sep 12, Ontario Medical Association (OMA) Board Chair Dr. Cathy Faulds announced that the Kaplan Board of Arbitration awarded Ontario’s doctors 9.95% for the first year of their Physicians Services Agreement (PSA). Sounds straightforward right? Nope – it’s actually ridiculously complicated.

I’ve looked at the award. I may have some of this wrong (copious documents found on the OMA website induced catatonia, hypersomnolence and cluster headaches). But this is my take.

A simplified (I have a small brain) set of numbers first:

Total award: 10%, approx value $1.6 billion dollars

Amount for general feel increases: 7% or $1.12 billion dollars

Amount for “targeted funding”: 3% or $480 million dollars.

In the past the OMA and Ministry agreed 1/4 of the raises would be across the board, the rest done with “relativity in mind”. IF we do that again then $280 million (1/4 of $1.12 billion) will be in across the board increases. Every specialty would get a 1.75% raise. The rest of the money ( $840 million) would be for raises based on relativity. So all specialties would get 1.75% + X as a raise. The “X” would vary. It would be more for low income specialties, and the X would be lower or even zero, for the high income specialties.

The Good.
There’s a raise. The MOH Team stated that Bill 124 should not impact the deal. The arbitrator disagreed and felt that we were unfairly treated because of Bill 124 stating:

“Bill 124 directly impacted the bargaining even though physician compensation was not subject to its terms.”

Hence, the MOH Team completely lost their argument that there should be no redress, and there was a 6.95% redress given.

There was a recognition that family practice is in crisis. In his ruling the Arbitrator said:

“We accept on the evidence that there is a physician shortage. Somewhere between 1.35 million and 2.3 million people in the province are not attached to a family doctor. These are real numbers. The Ministry’s own documents – which we ordered disclosed–demonstrate that there is a problem to address.”

The arbitrator had to order the Ministry to disclose this?? Jeez. Additionally, the Arbitrator noted:

“Clearly, more family doctors are needed as are more doctors practising comprehensive longitudinal medicine…..it is obvious that the citizenry is ageing – the Government acknowledges this brings with it increased complexity…”

Contrast this with the Ministry’s absolutely laughable position that there is “no concern” about a shortage of doctors. This is frankly a warning shot, and a welcome one, to the MOH’s negotiations team to not say such stupid things again, and to change their position in future rounds of negotiations.

Dr. David Price, member of the Ministry’s negotiations team

In another shot to the now obviously inept MOH Negotiations Team, the Arbitrator agreed that admin burden also needed to be addressed with, you know, money. He stated:

“We have reached the conclusion that targeted increases – not necessarily baked in – should be allocated to the reduction and redeployment of administrative work that can best be performed by others or through digital or other measures.”

Finally, It was quick. OMA Board Chair Cathy Faulds had told us not to expect an award until the end of September. Who knows why Kaplan put the award out so quickly.

The Bad.

This will not be enough. The OMA asked for a 22.9% increase. They got less than half of that. This is not really the big win the OMA is portraying it as.

A 10% increase in gross billings for family medicine will not be enough to stop the haemorrhaging of doctors from comprehensive family practice. The “X” for family medicine (see above) needs to be high, and much of the targeted funding needs to go to family medicine too.

And, while it’s true that the Arbitrator recognized there was a crisis in family medicine, the award given did not really do anything in and of itself to stabilize family medicine. It’s true that was not part of the scope of the arbitrator for this round (this round was for a fee increase). The fact that some practical guidance in how to resuscitate family medicine is missing is still bad for all Ontarians.

The Ugly

The implementation of this award is going to be a nightmare. As I write this, there is no indication that the MOH and OMA have agreed on how to divide up the $1.12 billion in general fee increases based on relativity. In fact, indications are that the MOH will continue to fight the methodology, meaning it could be a very long time before fee increases for specialties are set.

Worse, the OMA and MOH have not been able to agree on how to distribute the $480 million in targeted funds. Which means….more mediation and arbitration. I continue to concede that the OMA states arbitration and mediation will be done by mid- March 2025. I continue to not hold my breath.

Even uglier is that one solution being proposed would be to give “everyone” a 9.95% increase right now, until the relativity and targeted funding is sorted out. But that would mean that some of the higher paid specialties would see a 9.95% for a bit, only to have a relative cut once the final fees are sorted out (also to be arbitrated by March 3-7, 2025). No matter how you message this to warn people – this will cause problems when people see a decrease in income after a rise.

All of which means that the retroactive pay for this year may not come for over a year. If you are a physician who has some decisions to make (eg do you renew the lease on your office at the higher rates the landlord is demanding) – you are going to be awash in uncertainty.

The ugliest part of all of course, is that a bunch of lawyers are going to get really rich as their billable hours go through the roof during this process.

There is a better way.

The government’s main concern should be about expenditures. That decision has now been made for them. The PSB will go up by $1.6 billion. That money will have to be paid one way or another.

The government can now, especially after being told off by the Arbitrator back off from their polarizing and obstructionist path, accept the OMA proposals for implementing the award. They cover what the government states it wanted (pay lower paid specialist more of an increase than higher paid ones). They also covers issues around admin burden which the Arbitrator acknowledged exist, and the shortage of family physicians (which the arbitrator also acknowledged).

The total amount spent by the government is going to be $1.6 billion regardless. Getting rapid agreement on the distribution of those funds will decrease the uncertainty about how much goes where and will shorten the time it takes doctors to get paid, which will stabilize the health care system.

Then, for the love of Allah/God/Yahweh/Great Universal Consciousness – the government now needs to realize that you can’t fix health care without working co-operatively with your doctors. Go look at other provinces. Copy them and get a fair deal for years 2-4 of this agreement.

Or the government can continue to obstruct, obfuscate, delay and impede any real progress towards working together with more protracted, internecine mediation and arbitration. The ball is in their court.

What should doctors do?

The above represent my personal interpretations of the documents I read. I encourage all Ontario physicians to register for the OMA live session on Tuesday Sep 17 from 7:30 – 8:30 pm to hear more details about this agreement.

Never Ending Arbitration a Sign Government Does NOT Want to Work with Doctors

News Item #1: Prince Edward Island agrees to a contract with its doctors. Amongst other things, the deal recognizes that family medicine is a specialty (finally!) and increases compensation to reflect that. It also introduces strong measures to reduce red tape and administrative burdens, and adds what appear to be retention bonuses. PEI joins British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and even Alberta (!) in working co-operatively with their doctors.

Dr. Krista Cassell of Medical Society of PEI with Health and Wellness Minister Mark McLane and Health PEI CEO Melanie Fraser

News Item #2: Ontario Medical Association (OMA) Board chair Cathy Faulds announced last week that the Kaplan Board of Arbitration will not deliver a ruling on the fractious contract dispute between Ontario’s doctors and the Ministry of Health (MOH)at the end of August as expected. It is delayed until at least the end of September, if not longer.

Now you, dear reader, are probably wondering why I refer to a one month delay as “never-ending”. Firstly, because I’m not convinced it’s only one month. I don’t recall the Arbitrator ever giving us a timeline for when he was going to give a decision when I was on the OMA Board. Timelines for meetings and hearings, sure – but for the decision, no.

But more importantly, even if there is a ruling in September, it’s nothing but a mere step in a protracted, convoluted process that, at the end of the day, does nothing more than show that the government would rather not engage the OMA in providing solutions for our health care crisis. To understand why, one needs to first appreciate the prolonged nature of the current arbitration process, and just how tortuous it is. (I will do my best).

First, the current arbitration process is ONLY for one PART of the first year of what is supposed to be a four year contract. It will cover April 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025. BUT, it will only cover a percentage increase for that one year. It will not set specific fees for different specialties. Instead, there was general agreement (last I heard) that 70% of the increase would go towards fee increases and the other 30% would go towards targeted areas of high need.

Sounds simple enough to sort out right? If the deal is worth, say $2 billion (this number is totally made up and Mr. Kaplan, if you are reading, this number is much less than the increase should be), then $1.4 billion would go towards fee increases, and $600 million would be targeted towards areas of need.

The problem is that the fee increases are to be distributed along what’s know as a “relativity model”. Essentially lower paid specialists are to be given a bigger raise than higher paid ones. Unfortunately, the OMA and MOH can’t agree on how those raises are to be distributed amongst the various specialties. Worse, they can’t agree on how to distribute the 30% that was earmarked for “targeted funds”.

Which means…..you guessed it, ANOTHER round of arbitration with yet another set of decisions to be ruled upon by the arbitrator. This additional protracted process won’t begin until the arbitrators first ruling and further negotiations and mediations. The information on the OMA website suggests arbitration for those issues won’t happen until March 3, 2025.

But wait, didn’t I say that this was only for the first year of the four year contract? Why yes, yes I did. Which means that after this, we now start arbitration AGAIN for years 2-4 for the doctors contract. And yet again, not only do decisions needed to be made on the percentage increase, but on how that increase is divided up. Which means…….potentially many more rounds of arbitration.

I would concede the OMA websites suggests all of the year 2-4 arbitration, and left over issues from year one can be done at the same time (March 3-7, 2025). However, I will refrain from betting the mortgage on that actually coming to fruition. We are one early election from this timeline being thrown into chaos. The cynic in me thinks that by the time arbitration is all done for this supposed four year cycle, it will be time to start negotiating (and yes more arbitration!) for the next four year cycle.

The government will most likely abide by the initial arbitration award (it’s doubtful they would reject an award prior to an election call). Ontario Health Minister ~~Galen Weston~~ Sylvia Jones will frame this as part of the process for coming to an agreement. She will (probably) claim that by abiding by the award the government is “working with” physicians to benefit the health care needs of the province.

She will be wrong.

I’ve mentioned this before, arbitration is preferable to the days when governments could unilaterally cut physicians income at the whim of the health minister. However, that doesn’t change the fact that arbitration should be viewed as a necessary evil, with emphasis on the evil. Not only can it demoralize people who are going through it, the spill over effects have wide reaching consequences.

What does this mean for the general public? The OMA has come up with some solutions for the various crises our health care system is facing (2.5 million without a family doctors, worsening health care catastrophe in Northern Ontario, overwhelming bureaucratic burden etc). The reality is that many of the solutions require changes that need to be made in a contract with Ontario’s doctors. But we don’t have one, so none of these will be implemented.

Instead of working co-operatively with the OMA to come up with solutions in a fair contract, the current government seemingly prefers to leave it all to the arbitrator. And as a result, patients will continue to suffer.

The government of Ontario has a choice. Follow the lead of BC, Manitoba, PEI and so on and work with the doctors to help patients. Or set up a perpetual conflict with them.

Over to you Minister.

Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones, who can start to fix things tomorrow, if she wants.

Reflections on Leaving Family Practice

My thanks to Dr. Ramsey Hijazi, founder of the OUFP, and one of the strongest advocates for improving family medicine that I know, for guest blogging for me today. Unfortunately, the government didn’t listen to Dr. Hijazi, and as a result he left family practice earlier this year. In this blog he reflects on how his life has changed since.

It was a busy Saturday morning at my daughter’s dance competition in April 2024. The family had all got up at 5am to get ready for the day. The morning was hectic getting the kids and dog dressed and fed, making sure we didn’t forget supplies for the day, packing snacks and then rushing across the city to Hull for the competition.

My wife helped bring my daughter and her sister backstage to get dressed and prepare for practice. I watched my 2 year old son run tirelessly down the hall of the venue screaming in pleasure. I watched with a sense of calm and patience that I hadn’t felt in a very long time. More than I can remember I felt….present. The previous day I had left my family practice to pursue a position as a hospitalist. In less than 24 hours (and to my own disbelief) I noticed a distinct difference in my frame of mind.

Leaving family practice was not an easy decision. It is a rewarding and challenging career where you can make a positive difference in the lives of your patients. You get to know your patients better than anyone else in the medical system as you care for them from birth to old age. Their journeys in the medical system can remain with you forever. I became a family doctor because I loved family medicine and I am grateful for having had the opportunity to practice and take care of my patients. It is also part of the reason I started the Ontario Union of Family Physicians in July 2023 to help advocate for changes to improve the working conditions of family doctors. I had hoped to continue this work.

However, over the last several years the landscape of family practice has deteriorated significantly. The administrative or paperwork burden in family medicine has ballooned to almost 20 hrs/week. It is a constant barrage of work that is being downloaded or dumped on to family doctors from specialists, insurance companies and pharmacies. There’s also the extraordinary duplication of lengthy and sometimes irrelevant hospital reports that come in daily for review.

In essence, you supervise every single step all of your patients take in the medical system whether you have seen them recently or not. You ensure that tests and follow ups are completed and that nothing falls through the cracks. If my patients did not have me overseeing their journey in the system, countless tests and follow ups would get missed and never take place.

Like it or not, family physicians have been unofficially assigned the responsibility to make sure things actually get done when no one else will. It is mentally exhausting. There were days I would come home from work feeling so overstimulated I could do nothing more than sit on the couch and keep silently to myself for the rest of the night (although young kids make that a difficult reality to realize).

In an age where patients can simply email their family doctor you are never unplugged from your job. Despite trying to convince myself that I wouldn’t think or worry about work on vacation, I couldn’t help but have intrusive thoughts that occupied my mind. I would drift away from the present moment I was trying to enjoy. Often I would use the first and last days of my vacation as a desperate attempt to try and be caught up.

On weekends when not much was happening, such as watching TV with the kids or supervising them in the backyard I also couldn’t help but have the same intrusive thoughts of thinking my time could be better spent trying to catch up on the paperwork that was piling in. I very much resented having these thoughts.

Now add this to the stress of running a family practice. Business expenses have steadily increased with a dramatic spike in the last 3-4 years without any real increase in OHIP revenue. Running a business can be a stressful, but worthwhile endeavour. Unfortunately, this couldn’t be further from the reality of running a family practice. Revenue from OHIP continues to pay less year over year relative to inflation and expenses.

The OMA has kept track of OHIP rates relative to inflation to show current rates are only 37% of what OHIP used to pay physicians to run their practice. For the newer family doctors entering practice the future stability of the profession is truly grim. They enter practice with huge loads of debt and an almost guarantee they will take home less and less money every year despite the workload contrarily increasing year over year. With no pension, benefits, paid sick time or vacation to top it off, the reality for recent grads is that without significant changes to help the profession, it is no longer a viable career option.

Many family doctors work side jobs to help financially subsidize their practice. Granted, the entire medical system is plagued with poor working conditions, underfunding and increasing burdens of work, however, the situation is particularly magnified in family medicine. But you don’t need to take my word for it, just look around to see what is going on in your community and in our province. Despite the OMA showing statistics that we have more doctors trained in family medicine per capita than ever before, we are in one of the worst shortages ever.

Family doctors simply don’t want to do family medicine any more.

Changing my career path to work in the hospital as a hospitalist was a big risk and required a leap of faith (I hadn’t worked in a hospital since I finished residency). But unfortunately, in family medicine I had become increasingly unhappy professionally and personally. As it turns out, becoming a hospitalist was the best decision I could have ever made. Working in hospital means I am responsible only for the patients on my ward and not 1500 patients in the medical system. I must round on and see each patient to review their medical problems, perform examinations and order any tests or investigations. I follow up with family when needed and appropriate for medical updates. At the end of the day unless I am on call, I walk through the door to go home and my work is done until I arrive again the next morning. There is no appointment schedule to rigidly follow and I can take as much or as little time that is needed for each patient. If something unexpected occurs, I can deal with it and get back to my work without the worry or stress of being behind schedule and having irritated patients. It is also challenging and extremely rewarding.

No longer do I have all the stresses of running a business or see up to 40% of my OHIP billings go towards business expenses. No longer do I need to reconcile rushing several patients in and out of the clinic for appointments to stay on schedule and maintain a reasonable availability while also trying to give the appropriate time to address their concerns. No longer do I leave work at the end of the day, eat dinner with the family and go back to the computer to tackle the never ending pile of paperwork. No longer do I need to worry and stress while on vacation about all the work that is piling up in my absence. No longer do I have the intrusive thoughts of working on paperwork while watching the kids ride their bikes or to watch my son run down that venue hall aimlessly in pleasure.

I am more present and at peace. I am a better person, husband and parent because of my decision to leave family practice and that is perhaps the saddest and scariest thing about this entire journey.