#ONhealth – Page 3 – justanoldcountrydoctor

OMA’s Recent Messages to Family Physicians are Disappointing and Misleading

Last week, Alberta, the province that once had a health Minister who went to a physicians house to berate him in person, created a new pay model for their family physicians. Even Alberta, the province whose premier told the health service to not talk about vaccines, realized the obvious. Family physicians need to be paid commensurate to the foundational work they do, and the role they play, in a high functioning health system.

Alberta Premier Danielle “Covid? What Covid?” Smith

I’ve taken a look at the new Alberta model. Some of the specifics are gated but the rough overall numbers are public. My back of napkin math suggests there is about a 24% increase in gross income for family physicians with a practice size of 1200. This includes payments for indirect work (checking labs, reviewing reports, supervising staff – all the admin work that Ontario refuses to recognize) and increased payments for more complex patients. I congratulate my colleagues in Alberta on this accomplishment. It WILL stabilize not only family medicine, but their whole health care system.

In response OMA CEO Kimberly Moran sent out an email on Friday Dec 20th. (A complete guess on my part is that she saw some of the responses to this deal on Social Media). I personally was offended (but not surprised) by the manipulation of figures and data in her email. While it’s true that every thing she wrote in the email was technically correct, the manner in which it was presented created an impression of successes that just aren’t there when it comes to advocating for family physicians.

I hate to talk numbers, this stuff gets confusing. But here’s a short set of data you need to know (numbers rounded for simplicity).

2022/23 is the BASE YEAR for all future increases negotiated/arbitrated going forward
The 2022/23 physicians budget was $16 billion
For 2023/24 (the last year of the previous agreement) the OMA negotiated a 2.8% ($448 million) increase
for 2024/25 the Arbitrator awarded us 9.95% compounded to the 2.8% from 2023/24 – which winds up being 13.03% more than the BASE YEAR ($2.08 Billion more than 2022/23)

So what’s the problem? Well for starters Ms. Moran states that the OMA “successfully” advocated for a 9.95% increase without mentioning that the OMA asked for 22.9%. Getting less than half of what you ask for is successful? But more importantly she went on to tell family physicians that they will receive a higher increase than the arbitration award of 9.95%. (11.75 – 13.54% depending on the practice model). But here’s the thing, the arbitration award was the increase for one year only (2024/25). The increase that family doctors are getting is an increase from the BASE YEAR (2022/23) – so it reflects your increase for two years not one like the arbitration award. The two year increase to the physicians budget is, as mentioned above 13.02%.

Now I completely respect the fact that the numbers that I’m quoting do not reflect the fact that the the award is meant to be split 70/30 between fee increases and targeted funds (but neither did Ms. Moran’s email!!). A very brief summary of how targeted funds are supposed to work:

70% of the $2.08 billion are supposed to go to fee increases ($1.456 billion)
the other 30% is supposed to be targeted ( $624 million)
of the $1.456 billion, 25% ($364 million) is supposed to go to across the board (ATB) increases for everybody. Crunching the numbers means everyone gets a 2.27% increase to their 2022/23 (BASE YEAR) income. The rest of the increase is based on relativity. Ophthalmologists for example get an additional 0.18% for relativity, and family doctors get between 9.48 – 11.27% additional for relativity. But again – that’s the increase for TWO YEARS, whereas the 9.95% was just for the one year.

This type of sophistry in messaging from the OMA regarding family medicine is sadly all too common. For example, the OMA has said that Ontario Family doctors have the highest capitation rates in Canada. Is that statement true? Of course it is. BUT – what’s also true is that no other province has deductions for outside use. Also, at a bare minimum family physicians in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Alberta and Manitoba (with Manitoba being on top) pay family physicians more. Maybe Nova Scotia as well. Ignoring that while trumpeting higher overall capitation payments is unsettling.

While I sadly did expect such sleight of hand over numbers from OMA central, I must admit I was very disappointed in the SGFP email that came shortly thereafter. The SGFP has recently really gotten quite a bit stronger at advocating for family doctors and done some good work. But even they sadly fell into the trap when SGFP Chair Dave Barber told members in his letter:

“…Family doctors will receive increases greater than the 9.95% arbitration award announced earlier this year”.

David Barber – Chair of the Section of General and Family Practice

Again, technically a true statement, but very inappropriate. I don’t know what he was thinking signing off on that.

The really sad thing is that it didn’t have to be this way. The OMA (and SGFP) could have been completely forthright and honest and simply laid out the facts as I did above. This still shows family doctors getting a relativity bump more than a lot of other specialties. And they could have said that they want a good chunk of the targeted funds to go to Family Medicine but the government continues to fight them. Finally, they could have blamed the government for not recognizing the seriousness of the crisis. All of that still would have talked about the positive work being done, without creating the impression that they were trying to hoodwink the members. But alas……

What can we done? Well, I’ve said it many times before. Only the members can change the OMA if they want to. This year in particular, four physician members are up for election for Board Director – which represents half of all the physician positions. There are also multiple candidates running for SGFP executive positions. This really represents the best opportunity in a long time to continue to change the culture at the OMA so that we don’t get disingenuous messaging like this.

I’ll have my thoughts on the election in an upcoming blog.

Bureaucratic Vertigo in Ontario’s Home Care System

Bureaucratic vertigo in Ontario’s home care system, exacerbated by ineffective reforms and rebranding, has led to chaos and service stagnation, necessitating genuine engagement with frontline providers for meaningful transformation.

Dr. Merritt Cade (not their real name) is a concerned and experienced Ontario physician familiar with the current crisis in home care. Dr. Cade is worried about potential blowback from this blog that will affect their patients and so this blog is posted under a pseudonym.

Vertigo is a sensation where one perceives movement that isn’t happening. In the realm of healthcare administration, a similar phenomenon occurs—bureaucratic vertigo—an organizational dizziness that mimics change but leaves structures and systems untouched. Nowhere is this more glaring than in Ontario’s home care sector, a pivotal yet neglected component of our healthcare system.

In 2023, amid promises of reform, the Ontario government introduced Bill 135, the “Convenient Care at Home Act,” envisioning a streamlined home care service managed by Ontario Health atHome (OHAH). OHAH itself was to now be brought under the umbrella of Ontario Health, the implementation arm of the Ministry of Health. Hopes were pinned on this transformation bringing ease and efficiency. However, the reality has been a déjà vu of previous cycles of centralization and decentralization of health care structures, with patients and families shouldering the consequences.

Nowhere is the bureaucratic vertigo more evident than in the successive re-branding of home care over the last 8 years from “Community Care Access Centres (CCAC)” to “Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs)” in 2017 to “Home and Community Care Support Services (HCCSS)” in 2021, to the latest iteration, “Ontario Health atHome (OHAH)” in 2024. Meanwhile, regardless of the name used, the services provided by the home care system remained untouched.

Ontario Health and OHAH’s first substantive move—renegotiating contracts for medical supplies—illustrates how bureaucratic vertigo can lead to harmful consequences. Instead of solving issues, the new contract process disconnected decision-makers from frontline realities. The result? A severe shortage of medical supplies, medication delays, and a burden placed on already overwhelmed caregivers and families. Despite clear warnings from supply companies, these decisions disregarded frontline input, leaving healthcare providers to navigate chaos without support.

OHAH’s own front-line staff, the beleaguered Care Coordinators, were also caught completely off guard as rules regarding medications and catalogues of supplies changed overnight. Care Coordinators are the quarterbacks of the home care system, matching services to patients’ needs. What OHAH and Ontario Health did was akin to completely changing the playbook on their quarterbacks and teams, with sadly predictable results.

Despite all this, however, home care holds immense potential to address systemic challenges, from reducing ER congestion and the alternate level of care logjam to facilitating dignified end-of-life care at home instead of in hospitals. What is required is not another bureaucratic shuffle, but genuine engagement with those who understand home care’s nuances best: frontline providers. It is they who hold the practical knowledge necessary for meaningful reform.

The path forward demands that decision-making authority be shared with these healthcare professionals. Their experiences can inform policies that work in reality, not just on paper. This means abandoning the “bureaucrat knows best” mentality and embracing trust and collaboration. It means abandoning committees struck merely to check a box that says that frontline professionals were consulted when, in fact, their concerns do not meaningfully contribute to decisions made.

Furthermore, the status quo must not define future transformations. Further substantial changes to home care delivery, this time relating to the supply of equipment such as hospital beds, wheelchairs, walkers and other essential aids, was planned for rollout in October but has been delayed until January. Without a change in approach, we should expect similar upheaval when this takes place. Past failures demonstrate that superficial organizational changes do not equate to operational improvements. Genuine progress relies on a foundational renewal of leadership and strategy, prioritizing empathy, accountability, and proactive stakeholder engagement.

If we are to lift Ontario’s home care from its current crisis, change must be substantive, rooted in the insights of those who deliver care day-in, day-out. We must move beyond the spectre of bureaucratic vertigo and commit to sensible, informed solutions that truly benefit patients and families across the province. By trusting, listening to and involving the frontline, we can stop the spin and start the real work of reform.

Bureaucratic Stupidity in Covid Vaccine Clinic Case Will Have Far Reaching Consequences

I’ve repeatedly been told that I am too unkind and too harsh to Ministry of Health (MOH) bureaucrats. A senior staff member at the OMA once suggested I was “out of line” to a very sharp (but necessary) scolding I gave an MOH bureaucrat at a bilateral meeting we had. About a month later, that same senior staff person, when on a voice conference call with the same bureaucrat, got up and wrote “This is a waste of time” on a chalkboard at OMA headquarters. But I digress.

Yet every time I try to pull back, these same bureaucrats go and do something that is so incomprehensibly stupid that I once again wonder about the talent level and frankly intelligence of the bureaucracy as a whole at the MOH.

On this occasion, I’m referring to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan’s (OHIP) relentless persecution of Dr. Elaine Ma. The whole mess has been extensively reported and you can read all the details in the links, but I will summarize key points below:

October 25, 2024

Dr. Ma’s clinic in Kingston suddenly cancelled its October 26 drive thru flu/covid vaccine clinic. Over 600 patients had registered with more pending. The reason is that OHIP had notified her that she would not be paid to vaccinate patients at the clinic. Why? Because she was going to have medical students (who would be supervised) vaccinate. According to a 2001 bulletin OHIP pulled out, students are not employees and so she can’t delegate to them. (OHIPs story keeps changing and you’ll see that further down the blog). It also emerged that OHIP was attempting to recoup funds paid to her for running similar vaccine clinics in 2021.

October 30, 2024

It was now reported that OHIP was demanding Dr. Ma repay $600,000 that she billed to run outdoor vaccination clinics. She ran a number of mass Covid vaccinations clinics that gave over 35,000 shots. These were set up by her in response to the provinces call to “get shots in peoples arms“at the height of the Covid pandemic. Dr. Ma was widely lauded for her efforts at the time – and won the Ontario College of Family Physicians award of Excellence. Her area became the most vaccinated area of the province, something that should be celebrated.

OHIP now claims that she didn’t follow the rules for billing. Their excuse this time? That clinic was outdoors and not in a doctor’s office. (I told you OHIPs story would keep changing). Yes, you did read that right. In the middle of a pandemic caused by an airborne virus, OHIP wanted the vaccination clinics to be held in crowded indoor spaces!

November 1, 2024

Dr. Ma had rapidly gained the public support of the local medical officer of health (there was likely background support previously). She also had the support (previously background now public) of her MPP, the OMA and many others. She did not get the public support of Dr. Jane Philpott. Dr. Philpott, in her role as Dean of Queens Medical school was full of praise for the clinics. I suspect Dr. Philpott has 550,000 reasons to stay quiet publicly now. Hopefully she can influence behind the scenes.

OHIP now stated that the concern was that Dr. Ma used some of the funds to pay the staff who worked there. You read that right. They were worried because a physician billed OHIP (gasp!) then took the funds to pay overhead (double gasp!!). The horror!

Hannah Jensen, the Minister of Health’s Communications Director initially simply parroted the line that OHIP bureaucrats fed her about being ineligible to bill because of using medical students and it being outdoors. But she was rapidly exposed as being completely out of her depth when the Kingstonist questioned her about dates, which doctor, which clinics, how she arrived at figures and so on.

Additionally, her tone took a seriously ugly and aggressive turn. There was an accusation that Dr. Ma “pocketed the funds” which essentially is an accusation of theft. (No law enforcement is involved….yet).

November 7, 2024

The story hit the national news and it was reported that not only was OHIP asking Dr. Ma to pay back $600,000, but they were demanding $35K in interest as well (!). Who knew OHIP bureaucrats moonlighted as loan sharks??

November 8, 2024

Dr. Hijazi, leader of the Ontario Union of Family Physicians was interviewed by the CBC . He obviously was supportive of Dr. Ma demanded that the Ministry apologize to her. The Ministry issued an utterly and completely delusional statement to CBC radio stating that claims Ontario can’t get family physicians are “fictitious”. (Listen to the last 30 seconds at the link). 2.5 million people can’t get a family doctor in this province because doctors don’t want to work comprehensive care is “fictitious”????

Nothing much to see here. Just a fictitious clinic in Kingston, where fictitious people without a family doctor lined up hoping to get a doctor because a fictitious family doctor announced a new practice..

What consequences are there to this?

To0 many to mention, and they are all awful. Perry Brodkin, OHIPs former lawyer was quoted extensively in the articles about process. He pointed out that before attempting to recoup these funds, the bureaucrats would have run it up the chain to the deputy minister if not the health minister. There is therefore no doubt that this egregious action is one of the bureaucracy as a whole as opposed to one rogue bureaucrat. This cements the feeling that many physicians increasingly have had that bureaucrats as a whole are malicious (especially after the nonsense they claimed during arbitration).

It also badly threatens medical teaching. If the appeal that Dr. Ma filed is unsuccessful, then it essentially means that physicians would not get paid for teaching medical students. Which would effectively end teaching in Ontario. How exactly do you plan to replace the current supply of physicians as they age out, if no one will teach new ones?

With the story hitting the national news on CBC, it also will significantly impair attempts to recruit physicians from out of province. We are already losing younger doctors to provinces like BC and Manitoba where they see a co-operative relationship between government and physicians. Why would any of them come to a Province where you are called a hero one day, and then publicly embarrassed, harassed and vilified over a clearly outdated memo that needed to put aside during a once in a lifetime pandemic?

What SHOULD happen next (but probably won’t)

Unfortunately, Brodkin also points out that at this point there is nothing that will influence the appeal board. The process could have been stopped earlier before the hearing, but Sylvia Jones and her staff chose not to. But, if Dr. Ma wins, the government should immediately announce they will not appeal the decision to the courts. Additionally, Hannah Jensen needs to publicly apologize for her…..out of line…..comment on “pocketing” funds. And Sylvia Jones should also offer up an apology to Dr. Ma for the failure of her bureaucrats to recognize that rigid adherence to minutiae in a time of crisis is completely unacceptable.

Finally, what badly needs to be done is that the entire Ministry of Health bureaucracy needs to be given a very large enema to clear out the…….

Sunday Snippets – November 10, 2024

Another in a weekly series of brief snippets of health care stories that bemused, intrigued and otherwise beguiled me over the past week along with my random thoughts on the matter.

Item: An article in the College of Family Physicians of Canada Journal suggests that “recycling” physicians would help address family physician shortages. This includes “Physicians who have had successful careers in general surgery, emergency medicine, family medicine, hospitalist practices, and other specialties…”

My thoughts: Sigh. I get that the Journal is trying to be open to all views to stir discussion. I get that we are in a family practice crisis in all of Canada right now and looking at unique ways of helping. But seriously – you want to turn a retired general surgeon into a pseudo family doctor? Do you realize just how much you are denigrating family physicians by writing that a good chunk of their jobs can be replaced by people who haven’t done the residency? Some ideas belong in the trash heap and this one deserves to go there. Comprehensive care family physicians CANNOT BE REPLACED by anyone other than another properly trained comprehensive care family physician.

Item: It seems that Quebec is looking to find ways to force doctors to stay in the province and work in their public health system. They are even willing to as far as considering to use the Notwithstanding clause in the Constitution (which they would have to, as their initial position impinges on freedom of movement/assembly to make this happen).

My thoughts: It really does kill me to use Star Wars memes instead of Star Trek ones (really and truly). But once again, for this issue – I’m going to quote Star Wars character Princess Leia:

I honestly don’t know what to do with politicians anymore. There is ample, repeated, overwhelming evidence that whenever they pick fights with physicians, they inevitably lose and health care suffers. And yet they keep doing it.

Item: Dr. Corli Barnes (who I was honoured to have as a guest blogger) wrote in McLean’s Magazine (cover story no less!) about why she moved to Madoc, Ontario and the incentives they provided. I understand she took less than what is listed in the article’s headline, but there were incentives.

My thoughts: I’m happy for Dr. Barnes. I’m happy for the people in her community as well, as they are going to get healthcare from a dedicated family physician and their well being will improve as a result. But I really do wish that our system was no so fragmented and that all communities could offer a consistent level of support to their family physicians.

Item: Premier Doug Ford told patients with minor illnesses not to go to the ER. In response, Drs. Drummond and Venugopal had an op ed where they point out that the Premier is not qualified to determine what is an Emergency.

My thoughts: This will surprise some of you who know that I personally favour the Tommy Douglas model of health care, which supports user fees to dissuade misuse of the health care system. However, that is frankly up to the patients to decide for themselves. Drs. Drummond and Venugopal are correct in saying that politicians are not qualified to hand out medical advice, and should not be saying stuff like this.

Item: A study out of Michigan suggests that more virtual care will not lead to more unnecessary testing. A huge concern has been that if you cannot see a patient in person to assess this, a physician would be more likely to order a test “just to be sure”. This study suggests no.

My thoughts: I think the big flaw of this study is that it looked at patients who were in existing practices getting virtual care from their own physicians. There is a HUGE difference between getting care from your own physician virtually, or getting it virtually from someone you have never met before on some fancy looking app. The two are not the same and it would be very interesting to see how many unnecessary tests are done when there isn’t a pre-existing physician/patient relationship.

Item: Amina Zafar had an excellent piece in the CBC writing about how poorly managed your medical information is. She builds on the story of Greg Price, an unfortunate 31 year old who died of testicular cancer, when he probably shouldn’t have. She writes how this mismanagement of health care information is common in Canada.

My thoughts: Yes, yes, yes, a thousand times yes. As far as I’m concerned, the mismanagement of health IT should be the number one issue to be addressed in health care. It creates countless inefficiencies in our health care system. It creates all sorts of admin burden. It leads to much higher expenditures and duplicate testing. This needs to get fixed ASAP.

Item: The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) announced that nominations are open for their annual election periods. Up for grabs are four Board Director positions and many other District and Section positions.

My thoughts: Physicians in Ontario desperately need a strong OMA. The only way that can happen is if front line physicians stand up and take positions. I’ll be frank (and will offend a bunch of people) – but when I was on the Board there were too many Board Directors who clearly were in it for their own self interest and were not thinking of their colleagues. The same could be said for some other elected reps. We will get the OMA we deserve, but only if front line docs take a leading role.

We Know How to Save Family Medicine. Why Aren’t We Doing It?

I’m honoured to have Dr. Mark Linder guest blogging for me today. I first met Dr. Linder during our time advocating against Dr. Eric Hoskins unilateral cuts to health care. He’s exceptionally well spoken and articulate . He’s a former ER doctor and now full time family physician and clinic owner. His other claim to fame is that got fired from the Kaplan MCAT teaching course after one session – which apparently was a first.

I just wrote this in a flurry this morning. I see stupider and stupider proposals from the government and from newspaper editorials. I see our new grads learn from their teachers that they need to stay away from this job. I then see the domino effect this has on recruitment, job satisfaction and reinforced by absurd government initiatives to save the system. I watch the OMA get pulled in every direction to try and please everyone. So apologies in advance -this is just my take really-and mostly to get it off my chest-not that it will lead anywhere. So thanks for reading.

The Family Health Organization (FHO) is what saves family medicine. It has done it before and it can do it again.

In 2006 something unprecedented happened. It hasn’t happened before or since. And perhaps we didn’t quite appreciate how unique it was. The provincial Liberal government, under Dalton McGuinty and Health Minister George Smitherman, introduced an upgraded payment model for Family Medicine. It built on the existing capitation based Family Health Network (FHN) model to enhance it.

What was so unique about this? It stands out as one of the only times a government has thought beyond their 4 year term to the ultimate health of their population as well as their economy down the road when they may no longer be in power. Sure, it was going to make them look good if everyone got a family doctor out of it-but it was a big expensive risk, a risk based on an assumption that family medicine was critical to the system, AND that practitioners need to be paid fairly for their work if they wish to retain these doctors in the future. A different time to be sure!

It worked. Look at the stats from 2008 to 2018. Look at how many Family Doctors gladly embraced the new system. Look how the number of orphaned patients dropped.

The system had flaws. I mean this was the second iteration of what was described as an experiment. The “outside use” enforcement rule made little sense in most cases. The calculation of capitation payments wasn’t always a fair representation of how much work it took to look after the patient in front of you. Certain “in the basket” fees were bizarre and should never have been part of the package. Doctors were actually more incentivized to send people to the ER over a walk in clinic!!! But all in all, it was a great innovation, a great idea, and saved family medicine. It also, no doubt saved the province millions in treatment dollars and ER visits as family doctors made themselves available to look after patients.

And then, In 2015 Kathleen Wynne and Eric Hoskins, the health minister at the time, effectively shut down enrollment in FHOs And that was the beginning of the end. I presume they just wanted to control the immediate budget – paying for family medicine up front meant huge savings down the road. But it resulted in a pretty big chunk of budget going out the door NOW. And the Wynne liberals didn’t have a health care crisis, didn’t heed the warnings that we as physicians laid out pretty starkly at the time, and decided, nah, we’ll just “pause” the experiment.

Which they did. And the fall out was obvious. As a clinic owner and a family doctor, I had a front row seat. The residents and new grads had all been trained in the new system, and now were unable to access it. If they wanted to work, they’d be taking a tremendous risk setting up a clinic in a Fee For Service environment using a Schedule of Benefits that had failed to keep up with inflation for 20 years. They were screwed. The aging Family Doctor population continued to retire at a predictable rate, and the aging population continued to get more desperate to find doctors with increasing difficulty.

By the time the FHO’s opened up again in 2021, it barely mattered–The reputation of family medicine among new grads had been thrashed for 6 years.
With the new rules, new grads would have to gather 6 like-minded individuals (instead of just 3 like in the old days), or find a bigger FHO that was already established and could fit them in. Not so easy. Opening up your own shop had become increasingly more expensive with post pandemic inflation, so the debt would be crippling just to get started if you wanted your own clinic. And these are graduates who already had a huge amount of debt coming out of school.

Couple this with the insane increase in administrative burden as we become more and more efficient at having hospitals and labs forward us copies of paperwork. In theory, amazing, in practice hugely burdensome, time consuming and unpaid. Arguably, if the FHO rates had increased at the level of inflation, there’d be no complaints about this additional work. But the FHO rates had more or less remained static relative to the cost of doing business. Still better than FFS, still paid a lot less than the actual market value of doing the job as proven by the lack of uptake that continues today.

The thing is: The FHO is still the answer. It absolutely needs some significant tweaks. The rates need to go up. The outside use concept needs to go. Minimum size and shared EMR requirement needs to be softened so that smaller groups can join together in nearby geographic areas. Some sort of separate funding will be essential to help clinic owners to keep up with inflation. But it still achieves by far the best mix of physician autonomy, clinic management, and long term government savings. And it’s evidence-based! We have a recent history we can look back on to demonstrate efficacy!

Other solutions, such as having lesser-trained individuals diagnosing and managing patients give the appearance of short term gains at a huge future cost as more referrals to specialists are made and more referrals to the ER are made. Another concept of having government run all clinics is clearly so expensive as to be dead at the gates-Doctors currently pay for rent, administration and their own retirements out of their incomes. It’s not great for us, but it’s a heck of a lot cheaper for the taxpayer to do it that way, and simply pay the doctors more.

I recognize that my FFS colleagues are not helped at all by an enhancement and advocacy for the FHO approach. And I’m sorry. I obviously think there’s a lot of work that could be done to improve FFS rules and individual payments. No doubt.

But we actually have the evidence that the FHO saved family medicine when it was introduced. It was stunningly effective, and if nursed back to health, will absolutely work again.

Sunday Snippets – Oct. 27, 2024

I was away last week but I’m back with another in a weekly series of brief snippets of health care stories that bemused, intrigued and otherwise beguiled me over the past week along with my random thoughts on the matter.

Item: There was significant growth in the number of physicians in Alberta in the third quarter.

My Thoughts: Alberta is kind of a funny province. There are some very strange goings on with their health care policy. But it can’t be denied that despite all of that, if you provide incentives to attract younger physicians it will help. Having said that, it can all be easily undone if they don’t get on with it and implement the compensation for family physicians they promised, and for some reason appears to be delayed.

Item: The province of Nova Scotia has launched a physicians retirement fund initiative, helping physicians to retire well.

My Thoughts: What’s that you say? You mean ensuring that physicians have peace of mind about their retirement might actually help recruit (gasp!) and even retain (double gasp!!) physicians? Who would have thunk it?? In all seriousness, given the way the Federal Liberal government of our effete Prime Minister really screwed physicians with the recent tax law changes – this is a necessary move and I hope will get copied by all provinces. It really will help improve morale and reduce some of the burnout.

Item: John Richards and Tingting Zhang, from the CD Howe Institute wrote an op-ed in the Financial Post encouraging more use of nurse practitioners since they can “do almost everything an MD can”.

My Thoughts: El Toro Poo Poo. (This is a PG rated blog so that’s all I could get away with). I work with Nurse Practitioners and I have seen them help patients and I firmly believe they have a role in health care. But that role is not to replace physicians. The studies that show they can “do almost everything” are done based on what scope of practice suggests they can do. The blunt reality is nurse practitioners drive up costs and worsen care if used in settings as these characters suggest. The studies that show that NPs are cheaper ONLY look at the actual income an NP gets and compare it to a physicians income, as opposed to looking at the work that is actually done/number of patients seen/and number of tests ordered. The FP article isn’t even fit to be used for toilet paper.

Item: The crisis in Home Care supplies, first reported by Avis Favaro on X (formerly Twitter) continues. Home care nurses are reporting heartbreaking stories of patients buying their own supplies on Amazon since home care couldn’t provide them. Dr. Drew Moore and Dr. Hal Berman should be lauded for going public with their concerns. (I’ve met both of them and they are both mensches).

My Thoughts: I’m old. I’ve seen a lot of government screw ups in my time, especially in health care. But I have yet to see bureaucrats who screw up be truly held accountable and fired. Ever. They just get shuffled off to some other department. It it too much to ask that if someone makes a mistake at their job (and this is a BIG one) they get held accountable?

Item: Quebec is attacking family doctors for some reason. First they suggested they would link people to non-family physicians for care and even remove patients who were “healthy” from their own family physicians. Then they presented erroneous data suggesting that family doctors basically don’t work hard enough.

My Thoughts: There are 9 other provinces and 3 territories that would love to have these doctors.

Item: Penn State Medical Residents unionized, went on strike and got significant benefits (despite being driven off the hospital grounds by hospital security!)

My thoughts: Unionization of physicians is going to happen eventually. Whether through the long gestating Charter Challenge (yes my Ontario peeps – it is still working its way through the courts) or some other mechanism. The younger physicians clearly seem to want this model of representation and at some point in the not too distance future, physicians will be unionized.

Item: The Ontario government announced plans to effectively bar foreign students from attending medical school in Ontario.

My thoughts: My thanks to Am640 News for interviewing me on the topic, and my thoughts on this can be heard below. (This short version – this is populist rhetoric that will do nothing to help with the health care crisis):

My Interview on AM640 About the Current Crisis in Home Care

Was pleased to be interviewed by Ben Mulroney today discussing the current crisis in Home Care in Ontario. Unfortunately, the Ontario Health bureaucrats have really mucked up the process of ordering supplies for vulnerable patients at home, leading to immense suffering for patients at home and their loved ones.

Click below to hear more:

https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/shortage-of-medical-supplies-needs-an-urgent-fix/id1677003384?i=1000673744931

Ontario Government to Family Doctors: The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

That we have a family medicine crisis in Ontario is indisputable. That the numbers of family doctors leaving comprehensive care family medicine continues to rise and is expected to leave over 4 million people without a family doctor in the next couple of years is irrefutable. That the need to recruit and retain comprehensive care family doctors has never been more urgent especially as competition from provinces like British Columbia, Manitoba and others increases is unquestionable.

All of this is self evident to anybody following health care.

People lined up in Kingston desperately hoping to get a family doctor when a new clinic opened (image first put out by the CBC)

Except of course, the Ontario Government, and their Ministry of Health Bureaucrats. As far as they are concerned, now is actually the perfect time to attack family doctors. Because, you know, the way to improve burnout, morale and encourage them to take on new patients is to ambush people who are already under siege with overwhelming workloads.

Here’s what happened. About 6,000 family doctors in Ontario practice under what is called a Family Health Organization (FHO) model. Think of it as a base salary plus performance bonuses. As part of working in that model, the family doctors have to sign a contract agreeing to deliver a basket of services, including, a certain amount of after hours care.

Because we have so many rural areas in Ontario, where family doctors do a whole bunch of other work (emergency department, hospital on call, palliative care, long term care on call and more), there is a provision in the contract that says if you have X number of family doctors doing this kind of work already, then the amount of after hours care you provide as a FHO can be reduced. There’s a somewhat complicated formula but that doesn’t really matter – it’s the principle that counts. Essentially, if you are already doing after hours work – then you are not asked to do more after hours work.

Unless of course you are a Ministry of Health bureaucrat, taking the guidance of your bellicose negotiations team that said there was “no concern” about a shortage of family physicians. This allows you licence to use a stick against family physicians.

Then, you send letters to 75 FHOs telling them they are not meeting the terms of their contract, based on made up metrics. The letters (I’ve seen a few of them) all allege that the doctors in the FHOs are not living up to the terms of their contract.

Let’s be 100% clear on this. If a physician signs a contract as part of a FHO, they should hold up their end of the bargain. You should read the contract, go in with your eyes open, and make sure you are capable of meeting all of the terms that you agreed to.

BUT.

It appears what the Ministry is arbitrarily and unilaterally determining how to decide if a physician is meeting the terms. For example, one FHO letter I saw suggested that that FHO was not performing as well as its “peers” and was therefore targeted. Two things though. First the Ministry unilaterally decided who the peers were. Second, performing up to the standards of your peers was not part of the original contract.

Another letter I saw alleged that the doctors who do call for their hospital or their nursing home, don’t qualify because……they don’t bill enough for going into the hospital. The ministry unilaterally decided that in order to claim after hours work, you couldn’t just be on call, but you had to keep going into the hospital when on call, a certain number of times (this number was never up for discussion before).

I’ll use myself as an example. Last Wednesday I was on call for my hospital. I got three calls (one at 4:00 am!) and managed all the patients over the phones. I DID perform the task I agreed to (being on call). But the bungling bureaucrats won’t acknowledge that. They want me go to the hospital (even if I can handle it over the phone) and then bill OHIP for the service (which would drive UP the cost!!) to be recognized – a decision they seemingly made on their own, without consultation.

My two loyal fans and one non-fan regular reader know that I’ve long maintained that Star Trek is a far better franchise than Star Wars. But in this case, I will concede the Ministry’s actions are most appropriately compared to this fellow:

Normally when a government changes the terms of an agreement unilaterally, one would expect the Ontario Medical Association to step in and advocate for their members. However, the response from the OMA, in a letter sent to all its members was, frankly, pathetic. The letter basically told doctors to “notify the Ministry” about the circumstances around your group. Try to reason with Darth Vader as it was. No dedicated email or legal team staff member either. Just contact the general help email.

I guess specialists who had expressed concerns on Social Media about too many family doctors on the OMA Board have nothing to worry about. Clearly the OMA, between allowing the across the board increases to the arbitration award this year and not dedicating resources to tackle this issue cares nothing about family medicine. (They talk a great game on social media, but it’s the actions that count).

I imagine the issue will eventually sort itself out after many rancorous meetings and back and forth – all of which will take up physicians time and prevent them from doing minor and inconsequential things like, say, seeing patients. The Ministry will continue to claim that we have more family doctors than ever before – but let’s face it, if they keep behaving like this, those doctors won’t practice comprehensive care medicine. It just seems so ridiculous, and indicative of a Ministry that truly doesn’t understand or value family medicine.

And that should frighten the general public more than the Death Star ever did. (Drat, made ANOTHER Star Wars reference).

The original Death Star from Stars Wars, Episode IV: A New Hope

Arbitration Part III: When and How Much Will Docs Get Paid?

Disclaimer: The information is based on my personal analysis and should not be your sole source of information. The payment schedule below is based on what we were told was “PLANNED”. Being a firm believer in “Murphy’s Law“, I would suggest that changes to the below may come at any time. Contact info@oma.org with any questions.

After writing why the Arbitration Award will be bad for patients and doctors, it seems my three loyal readers were unhappy that I couldn’t say when docs would be paid. Being a demure, sensitive, and eager to please sort, I feel compelled to try my best to explain when money is coming.

Once again, my two examples are Drs. Alpine and Valley. Both had 13 years of post secondary education (4 years for a BSc, 4 years for medical school and 5 years for residency). Dr. Alpine does a lot of procedures and can see more patients than he could 20 years ago due to improved technology. Dr. Valley spends a lot of time with intensively sick patients, so she sees the same number of patients as 20 years ago.

What assumptions am I making for the Calculations?

Drs. Alpine and Valley will each provide same number of OHIP services yearly from 2023 – 2026. We have to assume that the entire 2.8 % increase from last year, and the 9.95% award this year will be given across the board (ATB) until April 1, 2025. (The OMA and MOH could reach an agreement on distributing the funds more fairly- but I highly doubt it). We’ll also assume that the schedule for payments the OMA provided at their webinar will be met – I remain very skeptical.

Let’s assume Dr. Alpine billed OHIP an average of $100,000 a month for fiscal 2022/23 and Dr. Valley billed OHIP $30,000 a month. This time period is the base rate for OMA calculations, and hence mine. (Physicians who read this blog can put their average 2022/23 monthly billings into the calculations below to find out their own numbers).

What happened for April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024?

The OMA and MOH agreed to a 2.8% increase in fees that was to be divided into across the board (ATB) increases and relativity increases. Because the agreement came late, and the OHIP Computers couldn’t be updated (sigh), Drs. Alpine and Valley continued to bill OHIP at the same rate as 2022/23.

What happened on April 1, 2024?

The OHIP computers finally updated to reflect the previous year’s increase. Since the two sides didn’t agree on a relatively formula, the 2.8% was given ATB. Dr. Alpine’s gross income went to $102,800 a month. Dr. Valley’s went to $30,840. Both increases showed up on the May Remittance. Doubtful Dr. Valley even noticed her increase.

What will happen on the Nov. 2024 Remittance ?

Well, finally all the reviewing and rejecting and re-submitting of claims for the year April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024 will have happened. The computers will then pay the retroactive 2.8% amount of this year to the doctors. Dr. Alpine will get an additional $33,600 (1.028 x $100,000 x 12) on his remittance for retroactive pay. Dr. Valley will get $10,080 (1.028 x $30,000 x 12).

Isn’t there a drop beginning in December 2024?

The increase drops to 2.55% and the funds saved are dedicated to enhancing the Hospital On Call Coverage program (HOCC). Dr. Alpine will now see $102,550 (1.0255 x $100,000 and Dr. Valley will start to get $30, 765 (1.0255 x $30,000).

What happens for the January – March 2025 Remittance Advice?

Allegedly, the OHIP computers will be able to apply the 9.95% increase for this year now (I’ll believe it when I see it). The word “prospective payment” was used in the webinar, but I don’t know what that means. This increase is compounded to the now 2.55% from the previous year. As a result, starting with the January remittance, Dr. Alpine will now get $112,753.73 ( 1.0255 x 1.0995 x $100,000) a month from OHIP. Dr. Valley will be at $33,826.12 a month.

What is supposed to happen on the March 2025 Remittance?

What’s that you say? Wasn’t the 9.95% increase supposed to start on April 1, 2024? So what happened to all that money? Well, according to the OMA you will get a lump sum payment for April to December in the March remittance. Dr. Alpine can expect to see a one time retroactive payment of $89,583. 57 ($112,753.73 that he should have gotten subtracting the $102,800 that he did get, multiplied by 9 months) and Dr. Valley will get $26,875.08. This is in addition to their usual remittance.

OK, What Happens After April 1, 2025?

Well at this point the new ‘permanent’ fees are supposed to kick in. Up until now, everyone has been given ATB increases. Whatever is negotiated or arbitrated, is supposed to start now. However, the base rate will be the 2022/23 rates. In a previous blog, I assumed that we would carry on the process of giving 1/4 of the increase as ATB and 3/4 via relativity. IF this is done (not sure if it will be) then every speciality will get 2.46% (0.7% for last year + 1.75% this year, compounded) plus X percent – with the X varying from speciality to specialty based on relativity.

Let’s assume Dr. Alpine’s speciality got an X=0% and that Dr. Valley’s got X = 17.54%. In that case Dr. Alpine will now get $102,460 a month:

$100,000 base rate from 2022/23 x (1.0246 ATB increase + 0 for relativity).

Dr. Valley on the other hand will get $36,000 a month:

$30,000 base rate from 2022/23 x (1.0246 ATB +.1754 for relativity).

I imagine Dr. Alpine will be annoyed.

What are the chances of the new fees being ready on April 1, 2025?

Slim to none. Militancy on the part of the MOH and incompetence on the part of bureaucrats in charge of OHIP are two constants as sure as death and taxes.

Um…well what happens to our monthly incomes after April 1, 2025?

I honestly can’t figure that part out (and not for lack of trying). The procedural agreement states:

“Any unexpended portion of the targeted price increases will continue to be paid to physicians as a separate payment on the monthly Remittance Advice until such time as each targeted increase is implemented or unless the parties agree otherwise.”

This is the part that I think most people have missed (including, frankly, the OMA Board that approved this agreement – and yes I know it was an attempt to get real money in the hands of physicians). It’s one thing to accept 2.8% ATB. But to accept 12.75% ATB (2.55% from last year compounded with 9.95% from this year) is a bit much. You really have to wonder if there wasn’t a fairer way to spend this money, especially with so many Dr. Valley’s struggling. Time will tell what happens here.

Geez old country doctor, all you’ve done is fuzzify the muddification!

I aim to please dear reader. I aim to please.

SPECIAL MESSAGE FOR FAMILY PHYSICIANS ONLY

Those of you who have read my blogs know that I (and many others) are really really upset with College of Family Physicians of Canada for inviting Dr. David Price to be a keynote speaker at the Family Medicine Forum. I view it as a slap in the face to family physicians, given his role on the Ontario Government’s Negotiations Team.

The Ontario Union of Family Physicians would seem to agree with me. They are asking all family physicians to sign the petition below to have Dr. Price removed as a Keynote speaker. PLEASE click on this link to read and I encourage you to sign.

Arbitration Part II: Award Implementation Will Hurt Physicians/Patients

Disclaimer: The information below is based on what a non-lawyer (i.e. me) was able to sort out after reading the OMA and Ministry’s 2024-2028 Procedural Agreement, the OMA Legal Counsel’s summary of the award, and attending the OMA Zoom session on the award. This may not be accurate (and I will correct the blog if more relevant information becomes available). I encourage all OMA members to contact the OMA directly with specific questions (info@oma.org) and not rely on this blog as your sole source of information.

OMA Negotiations Counsel Howard Goldblatt

The Numbers

First, let’s again review the numbers (approximated for simplicity).

Physician Services Budget, fiscal year ending March 2024: $16 Billion +

Arbitration Award: 9.95% – approximately $1.6 billion

OMA/MOH agreement on split of funds: 70% ($1.12 Billion) to fee increases and 30 %( $480 million) to targeted programs.

Previous contract (no guarantee this will repeat): 25% of the fee increases ($280 million) would go to across the board (ATB) fee increases for entire profession. The remainder ($840 million) would be distributed on the basis of relativity (giving more of a raise to low earning specialties and less to higher earning specialties). IF this pattern repeats, this equals a 1.75% increase for everyone. Then each specialty would get assigned an additional percentage (let’s say X) based on relativity. Ergo everyone should get 1.75% + X, where X varies from zero (for high billers) to higher (for lower billers).

The Implementation

According to the OMA webinar, the OMA and Ministry have yet to agree how to distribute the award. Mediation starts early October and all of this might wind up in Arbitration in March of 2025. My sense from watching the webinar is they are not close on an agreement.

So what happens to the money for this year? We are all supposed to get a raise now right? Well, that’s when the procedural agreement takes effect. It states (sorry for the legalese):

The Year 1 price increase will be implemented as follows:
a. The entire price increase under the Year 1 2024-28 PSA will be implemented
prospectively as an across-the-board increase to the fee-for-service payments
identified in paragraph 1a above, with a target date of the RA in the month 90
days following the issuance of the arbitration decision, and will flow through to
non-fee-for-service payments as soon as practicable.
b. A lump sum payment equal to the entire increase awarded for Year 1 for the
earlier period from April 1, 2024 through to the implementation date under
paragraph 12(a), will be paid as soon as practicable following the arbitration
award with a target date of October 2024.
c. To the extent practicable, the permanent year 1 non-targeted price increases
will be implemented at the same time as the April 1, 2023, price increases
under Year 3 of the of the 2021-24 PSA i.e. April 1, 2025, and in any event no
later than October 1, 2025. These increases will be calculated on a base of
2023-2024 expenditures …… The distribution as between across the board increases and relativity increases will be determined in such manner as the parties agree or, failing agreement, as the board of arbitration awards….

OMA staff confirmed at the webinar that this is in fact what will happen. They even had a complex schedule of prospective payments/lump sum payments/retroactive payments and so on that left me, frankly in need of high doses of Zofran.

To try and simplify things, let’s look at how this will affect two doctors.

Meet Drs. Alpine and Valley

Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley both completed four years of an undergraduate degree. They then completed four years of medical school, and each did a five year residency in the field of their choosing. Dr. Alpine was always someone who liked to “do stuff”. He wound up in a speciality that does a lot of procedures and as technology has improved, has been able to treat more patients in a day than his specialty could 20 years ago.

Dr. Valley, who is no less smart, really enjoys patient interaction. She chose a specialty that requires more intensive time with patients, and as such, is not able to see more people in a day than someone in her field could 20 years ago.

With our aging population and increasingly complex health care needs – both Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley are swamped and have long waiting lists.

Dr. Alpine, was able to bill OHIP $1 million for fiscal year ending March 2024. This represents his gross income, and to be fair, his office has a lot of leased medical equipment, along with staff that he has to pay for out of that $1 million. Dr. Valley billed OHIP $350 thousand for fiscal year ending March 2024. She too has staff and other overhead expenses, but not as much equipment.

What happens to Dr. Alpine and Dr. Valley under the procedural agreement? While the schedule for payments for the award is a convoluted mess, the reality is that for the fiscal year ending March 2025 – Dr. Alpine will gross $1.1 million, and Dr. Valley will gross $385,000.

Now the OMA states that the goal is to have new permanent fees in place based on relativity and targeted funding for April 1, 2025. The ONLY way this could happen is if the government negotiations team completely capitulates its positions in the next couple of weeks. Seriously people, the schedule shows that if there is no agreement this thing goes to Arbitration in early March 2025. IF that happens, it’s part and parcel of Arbitration for the 2-4 years of the contract. So the Arbitrator probably won’t even make a ruling until September 2025. Then another six months to re program the ancient OHIP computers and while the fees may be retroactive to April 1, 2025, you likely won’t see the money until Spring 2026.

Let’s assume that the arbitrator follows the precedent set where 1/4 of the increase ( $280 million) should indeed be ATB, and then distributes the rest based on relativity. And let’s assume that Dr. Alpine’s speciality was assigned an X of 0% and Dr. Valley got an X of 18.25%. Therefore Dr. Alpine for the fiscal year ending March 2026 will gross $1.0175 million – a reduction of $82,500 dollars from the year before. While Dr. Valley will get bumped to $420,000.

No matter how often the OMA reminds people that the increase for the first year is one time only, and NOT a permanent increase, the reality is that many members will have budgeted around their increase, and Dr. Alpine will, be very miffed at a $82,500 reduction in income for doing the same work.

But it’s not all that great for Dr. Valley either. She will have missed one year of a substantial increase that should have gone to her earlier. Not only that, but her offices cost pressures and admin workload have been skyrocketing. She needs the stability a relativity based formula provides right now, not in March of 2026.

Because of the delay in stabilizing her practice, she actually chose to leave her practice and do a different kind of medicine. Her patients now have to go back on a waiting list, and who knows when they can find someone to take over their care.

I understand why this procedural agreement was put in place. It was to ensure that doctors got a much need cash injection sooner rather than later. But unfortunately there are unintended consequences of this and those are coming to fruition. Specialists like Dr. Valley who need the relativity increases right now will not be able to hold out and may leave their practices. Dr. Alpine will be understandably miffed at the yoyoing of his income.

And all of this uncertainty will do nothing to help the health care system.